-
The transmission polarization conversion metasurface has been widely concerned, because it has the advantage of being easy to be conformal with the antenna. Based on the reasonable arrangement of transmission polarization conversion units, various and complex electromagnetic functions can be realized. As the electromagnetic open window on the flight platform, the antenna is the bottleneck that restricts the decrease of radar cross section (RCS) of the whole flight platform. It is difficult to simultaneously realize the normal and efficient radiation of the antenna and the decrease of the RCS of the antenna. When the designed transmission metasurface is used in the antenna design, the radiation and scattering of the antenna can be regulated comprehensively. In this paper, a composite polarization conversion metasurface is proposed and verified. The unit cell of composite polarization conversion metasurface consists of two mirror symmetrical anisotropic metal patches in the upper layer, a dielectric layer and a polarization gate in the lower layer. When the polarization direction of the incident electromagnetic wave is perpendicular to the extension direction of the polarization gate and arrives at the composite polarization conversion surface, the conversion surface can realize the conversion from transmission linear polarization to right-hand circular polarization in a frequency range from 9.3 GHz to 10.9 GHz. When the polarization direction of the incident electromagnetic wave is parallel to the extension direction of the polarization gate, co-polarized total reflection can be realized. The chessboard arrangement metasurface is composed of composite polarization conversion unit and its mirror unit. A novel linearly polarized chessboard arrangement metasurface antenna is composed of the linearly polarized source microstrip antenna with a bandwidth of 9.4–10.7 GHz and the chessboard arrangement metasurface. By using the counter rotating cancellation characteristic of circular polarization, the chessboard arrangement metasurface antenna maintains linearly polarized radiation. Comparing with the source microstrip antenna, the linear polarization purity of chessboard arrangement metasurface antenna is improved from 9.5 GHz to 10.5 GHz. At the same time, the forward gain of the chessboard arrangement antenna increases and the radar cross section decreases. The maximum reduction is 39.2 dB. To further verify the practicability of the design and analysis, the chessboard arrangement metasurface antenna sample is fabricated and measured in microwave anechoic chamber with an Agilent 5230C network analyzer. The experimental results are in good agreement with the simulation results. This study has important reference value in the design of high gain, low RCS antenna and integrated regulation radiation and scattering of antenna.
-
Keywords:
- transmission polarization convention /
- metasurface /
- antenna
[1] Challita F, Laly P, Yusuf M, Tanghe E, Joseph W, Lienard M, Gaillot D P, Degauque P 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 297Google Scholar
[2] Gaillot D P, Tanghe E, Joseph W, Laly P, Tran V C, Lienard M, Martens L 2015 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63 3219Google Scholar
[3] Dimitrov K C, Lee Y, Min B W, Park J, Jeong J, Kim H J 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 317Google Scholar
[4] Hasani H, Silva J S, Capdevila S, Garcia-Vigueras M, Mosig, J R 2019 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 67 5325Google Scholar
[5] 韩江枫, 曹祥玉, 高军, 李思佳, 张晨 2016 物理学报 65 044201Google Scholar
Han J F, Cao X Y, Gao J, Li S J, Zhang C 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 044201Google Scholar
[6] Lin D M, Fan P Y, Hasman E, Brongersma M L 2014 Science 345 28Google Scholar
[7] Tao Z, Wan X, Pan B C, Cui T J 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 121901Google Scholar
[8] Binion J D, Lier E, Werner D H, Hand T H, Jiang Z H, Werner P L 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 1302Google Scholar
[9] Lei M, Feng N Y, Wang Q M, Hao Y N, Huang S G, Bi K 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 119 244504Google Scholar
[10] Luo H, Cheng Y Z 2019 Opt. Mater. 96 109279Google Scholar
[11] Wu L W, Ma H F, Gou Y, Wu R Y, Wang Z X, Wang M, Gao X X, Cui T J 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 12 024012Google Scholar
[12] Zheng Q Q, Li Y F, Pang Y Q, Chen H Y, Sui S, Yang J F, Ma H, Qu S B, Zhang J Q 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 4470Google Scholar
[13] Yang B W, Liu T, Guo H J, Xiao S Y, Zhou L 2019 Sci. Bull. 64 823Google Scholar
[14] Li S J, Li Y B, Li H, Wang Z X, Zhang C, Guo Z X, Li R Q, Cao X Y, Cheng Qiang, Cui T J 2020 Ann. Phys.(Berlin) 6 2000020Google Scholar
[15] Guo Y H, Huang Y J, Li X, Pu M B, Gao P, Jin J J, Ma X L, Luo X G 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1900503Google Scholar
[16] Li S J, Cui T J, Li Y B, Zhang C, Li R Q, Cao X Y, Guo Z X 2019 Adv. Theory Simul. 2 1900105Google Scholar
[17] Yu Y Z, Xiao F J, He C, Jin R H, Zhu W R 2020 Opt. Express 28 11797Google Scholar
[18] Grady N K, Heyes J E, Chowdhury D R, Zeng Y, Reiten M T, Azad A K, Taylor A J, Dalvit D A R, Chen H T 2013 Science 340 1304Google Scholar
[19] Yu H C, Cao X Y, Gao J, Yang H H, Jidi L R, Han J F, Tong L I 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 3373Google Scholar
[20] Lin B Q, Guo J X, Ma Y H, Wu W S, Duan X Y, Wang Z, Li Y 2018 Appl. Phys. A 124 715Google Scholar
[21] Guo Z X, Cao X Y, Gao J, Yang H H, Jidi L R 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 115103Google Scholar
[22] Ni C, Chen M S, Zhang Z X, Wu X L 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 17 78Google Scholar
[23] 兰俊祥, 曹祥玉, 高军, 韩江枫, 刘涛, 丛丽丽, 王思铭 2019 物理学报 68 034101Google Scholar
Lan J X, Cao X Y, Gao J, Han J F, Liu T, Cong L L, Wang S M 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 034101Google Scholar
[24] Modi A Y, Alyahya M A, Balanis C A, Birtcher C R 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 1436Google Scholar
-
图 9 棋盘排布表面-天线与源天线对比图 (a) 反射系数随频率变化; (b) 轴比随频率变化; (c) 实际增益随θ变化; (d) 实际增益随频率变化
Figure 9. Comparison between the chessboard arrangement metasurface-antenna and source antenna: (a) Reflection coefficient varies with frequency; (b) AR varies with frequency; (c) realized gain varies with θ; (d) realized gain varies with frequency.
图 11 天线低RCS特性分析曲线 (a) 源天线和棋盘排布表面-天线单站RCS; (b) 单元及其镜像单元反射幅值曲线; (c) 单元及其镜像单元极化转换率曲线; (d) 单元及其镜像单元反射相位曲线
Figure 11. Analysis curve of low RCS characteristics of antenna: (a) Source antenna and chessboard arrangement metasurface-antenna single station RCS; (b) reflection amplitude curve of unit and its mirror unit; (c) polarization conversion curve of unit and its mirror unit; (d) reflection phase curve of unit and its mirror unit.
图 13 仿真结果与实验结果对比 (a) 源天线反射系数随频率变化; (b) 源天线实际增益随θ变化; (c) 棋盘排布表面-天线反射系数随频率变化; (d) 棋盘排布表面-天线实际增益随θ变化
Figure 13. Comparison between simulation results and measurement results: (a) Reflection coefficient varies with frequency of source antenna; (b) realized gain varies with θ of source antenna; (c) reflection coefficient varies with frequency of chessboard arrangement metasurface-antenna; (d) realized gain varies with θ of chessboard arrangement metasurface-antenna.
-
[1] Challita F, Laly P, Yusuf M, Tanghe E, Joseph W, Lienard M, Gaillot D P, Degauque P 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 297Google Scholar
[2] Gaillot D P, Tanghe E, Joseph W, Laly P, Tran V C, Lienard M, Martens L 2015 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63 3219Google Scholar
[3] Dimitrov K C, Lee Y, Min B W, Park J, Jeong J, Kim H J 2020 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19 317Google Scholar
[4] Hasani H, Silva J S, Capdevila S, Garcia-Vigueras M, Mosig, J R 2019 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 67 5325Google Scholar
[5] 韩江枫, 曹祥玉, 高军, 李思佳, 张晨 2016 物理学报 65 044201Google Scholar
Han J F, Cao X Y, Gao J, Li S J, Zhang C 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 044201Google Scholar
[6] Lin D M, Fan P Y, Hasman E, Brongersma M L 2014 Science 345 28Google Scholar
[7] Tao Z, Wan X, Pan B C, Cui T J 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 121901Google Scholar
[8] Binion J D, Lier E, Werner D H, Hand T H, Jiang Z H, Werner P L 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 1302Google Scholar
[9] Lei M, Feng N Y, Wang Q M, Hao Y N, Huang S G, Bi K 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 119 244504Google Scholar
[10] Luo H, Cheng Y Z 2019 Opt. Mater. 96 109279Google Scholar
[11] Wu L W, Ma H F, Gou Y, Wu R Y, Wang Z X, Wang M, Gao X X, Cui T J 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 12 024012Google Scholar
[12] Zheng Q Q, Li Y F, Pang Y Q, Chen H Y, Sui S, Yang J F, Ma H, Qu S B, Zhang J Q 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 4470Google Scholar
[13] Yang B W, Liu T, Guo H J, Xiao S Y, Zhou L 2019 Sci. Bull. 64 823Google Scholar
[14] Li S J, Li Y B, Li H, Wang Z X, Zhang C, Guo Z X, Li R Q, Cao X Y, Cheng Qiang, Cui T J 2020 Ann. Phys.(Berlin) 6 2000020Google Scholar
[15] Guo Y H, Huang Y J, Li X, Pu M B, Gao P, Jin J J, Ma X L, Luo X G 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1900503Google Scholar
[16] Li S J, Cui T J, Li Y B, Zhang C, Li R Q, Cao X Y, Guo Z X 2019 Adv. Theory Simul. 2 1900105Google Scholar
[17] Yu Y Z, Xiao F J, He C, Jin R H, Zhu W R 2020 Opt. Express 28 11797Google Scholar
[18] Grady N K, Heyes J E, Chowdhury D R, Zeng Y, Reiten M T, Azad A K, Taylor A J, Dalvit D A R, Chen H T 2013 Science 340 1304Google Scholar
[19] Yu H C, Cao X Y, Gao J, Yang H H, Jidi L R, Han J F, Tong L I 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 3373Google Scholar
[20] Lin B Q, Guo J X, Ma Y H, Wu W S, Duan X Y, Wang Z, Li Y 2018 Appl. Phys. A 124 715Google Scholar
[21] Guo Z X, Cao X Y, Gao J, Yang H H, Jidi L R 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 115103Google Scholar
[22] Ni C, Chen M S, Zhang Z X, Wu X L 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 17 78Google Scholar
[23] 兰俊祥, 曹祥玉, 高军, 韩江枫, 刘涛, 丛丽丽, 王思铭 2019 物理学报 68 034101Google Scholar
Lan J X, Cao X Y, Gao J, Han J F, Liu T, Cong L L, Wang S M 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 034101Google Scholar
[24] Modi A Y, Alyahya M A, Balanis C A, Birtcher C R 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 1436Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8136
- PDF Downloads: 254
- Cited By: 0