Research progress of electromechanical graphene resonant sensors

Wan Zhen; Li Cheng; Liu Yu-Jian; Song Xue-Feng; Fan Shang-Chun

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220215

Abstract

The resonant sensor is a kind of high-sensitivity and high-stability sensor that directly outputs digital signals. The resonance sensitive elements of traditional resonant sensors are mostly made of metal, quartz crystal, silicon and other materials. However, with the development of resonant sensor toward the miniaturization and intellectualization, the sensitive materials of new resonator are micro-nano machined and highly sensitive. As a new type of two-dimensional nanomaterial, graphene has the great potentials in the field of resonance sensing because of its excellent mechanical, electrical, optical and thermal properties. Therefore, the mechanical quantity sensor based on graphene material is expected to surpass the silicon material mechanical quantity sensor in many aspects such as micro-nano size, high performance, and environmental adaptability. This review focuses on the graphene resonant mechanical quantity sensor. In the first part, we summarize the basic properties, preparation methods, and transfer methods of graphene materials. The preparation and transmission methods of graphene are key to high-performance graphene resonator, but there are still different problems in the preparation and transfer of graphene, which also greatly restricts the development of graphene resonator. In the second part, the basic theory of resonant sensors is given, and the common methods of transferring graphene films are introduced in detail. Then the theoretical and experimental studies of graphene resonator are discussed. For example, the theoretical studies of graphene resonator are investigated by using the classical elastic theory, non-local elastic theory, molecular structure mechanics and molecular dynamics. Then the effects of graphene preparation method, graphene layer number and shape, excitation and detection methods on the resonance performance are estimated in the resonant experiments of graphene resonators. After that, the research progress of graphene resonator is summarized in the fields of pressure, acceleration and mass sensors. Compared with traditional silicon resonators, graphene resonators have a small dimension and demonstrate preferable resonant performance under low-temperature and low-pressure conditions. In this case, the technical issues of graphene resonant sensor are introduced to emphasize the importance of suspended graphene film transfer, structure fabrication of harmonic oscillator and vibration excitation/detection of resonators, which contributes to the potential applications in the fields of aerospace, intelligent detection and biomedical sensing for graphene resonant sensors.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2.
Emerging Industry Technology Research Institute of Beihang University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
3.
Institute of Quantum Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

Corresponding author: Li Cheng, licheng@buaa.edu.cn ; Song Xue-Feng, songxf@sustc.edu.cn ;

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62173021), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 4212039), the Aviation Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2020Z073051002), and the Science Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, China (Grant No. JCYJ20180504165721952).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Tabata O, Yamamoto T 1999 Sensors and Actuators 75 53 Google Scholar
[2]	樊尚春, 朱黎明, 邢维巍 2019 计测技术 39 4 Google Scholar Fan S C, Zhu L M, Xing W W 2019 Metrology and Measurement Technology 39 4 Google Scholar
[3]	Stachiv I, Gan L 2019 Materials 21 3593 Google Scholar
[4]	Su S X P, Yang H S, Agino A M 2005 IEEE Sens. J. 5 1214 Google Scholar
[5]	Nie J, Meng X, Li N, Lin L 2017 Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 256 1 Google Scholar
[6]	Yu X, Chen X, Ding X, Zhao X 2017 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 67 1 Google Scholar
[7]	Li C, Zhang Q W, Zhao Y L, Tian C, Li B, Han C, Bai B 2021 J. Micromech. Microeng. 31 115001 Google Scholar
[8]	John G, Troy W 1993 Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 37 82 Google Scholar
[9]	Ikeda K, Kuwayama H, Kobayashi T, Watanabe T, Nishikawa T, Yoshida T, Harada K 1990 Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 21 146 Google Scholar
[10]	Chen F, Gao J, Tian W 2017 Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 269 427 Google Scholar
[11]	Lei F, Dupuis P, Durrieu O, Zissis G, Maussion P 2017 IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 53 5988 Google Scholar
[12]	樊尚春, 孙苗苗, 李成 2012 传感技术学报 25 1 Google Scholar Fan S C, Sun M M, Li C 2012 J. Trans. Technology 25 1 Google Scholar
[13]	Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 5696 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhang Y B, Tan Y W, Stormer H L, Kim P 2005 Nature 438 201 Google Scholar
[15]	Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183 Google Scholar
[16]	Geim A K 2009 Science 324 1530 Google Scholar
[17]	Rao C N, Sood A K, Subrahmanyam K S, Govindaraj A 2010 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48 7752 Google Scholar
[18]	Smith B R, Conger M J, Mcmullen J S, Neubert M J 2019 J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 11 1 Google Scholar
[19]	Cabrera H, Mendoza D, Benítez J L, Bautista F C, Alvarado S, Marín E 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 465501 Google Scholar
[20]	De S, Coleman J N 2010 Acs Nano. 4 2713 Google Scholar
[21]	Nika D L, Askerov A S, Balandin A A 2012 Nano Lett. 12 3238 Google Scholar
[22]	Pang C, Lee G Y, Kim T I, Sang M K, Hong N K, Ann S H, Sun K Y 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 795 Google Scholar
[23]	Ding G, Li X, Xu Z, Chen H, Wang M 2021 IEEE Electr. Device Lett. 42 236 Google Scholar
[24]	Jung M. W, Myung S, Kim K W, Song W, Jo Y Y, Lee S S, Lim J, Park C Y, An K S 2014 Nanotechnology 25 285302 Google Scholar
[25]	Jaakkola K, Sandberg H, Lahti M, Ermolov V 2019 IEEE Trans. Compon. Pack. Manuf. Technol. 9 1 Google Scholar
[26]	Lee H, Choi T K, Lee Y B, Cho H R, Ghaffari R, Wang L, Kim D H 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 566 Google Scholar
[27]	Seo D H, Pineda S, Fang J, Gozukara Y, Yick S, Bendavid A. Lam S K H, Murdock A T, Murphy A B, Han Z J 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14217 Google Scholar
[28]	黄乐, 张志勇, 彭练矛 2017 物理学报 66 218501 Google Scholar Huang L, Zhang Z Y, Peng L M 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 218501 Google Scholar
[29]	赵鹏程, 樊尚春 2017 计测技术 37 4 Google Scholar Zhao P C, Fan S C 2017 Metro. Measure. Technol. 37 4 Google Scholar
[30]	Stankovich S, Dikin D A, Piner R D, Kohlhaas K A, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Ruoff R S 2007 Carbon 45 1558 Google Scholar
[31]	Ju H M, Huh S H, Choi S H, Lee H L 2010 Mater. Lett. 64 357 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang H, Robinson J T, Li X, Dai H 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 9910 Google Scholar
[33]	Reina A, Jia X, Ho J, Nezich D, Son H, Bulovic V, Kong J 2009 Nano Lett. 9 3087 Google Scholar
[34]	Li X, Cai W, An J, Kim S, Nah J, Yang D, Ruoff R S 2009 Science 324 1312 Google Scholar
[35]	Sprinkle M, Ruan, Hu Y, Hankinson J, Rubio-Roy M, Zhang B, Wu X, Berger C, de Heer W A 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 727 Google Scholar
[36]	Liang X, Sperling B A, Calizo I, Cheng G, Hacker C A, Zhang Q, Richter C A 2011 ACS Nano. 22 9144 Google Scholar
[37]	Li X, Zhu Y, Cai W, Borysiak M, Han B, Chen D, Ruoff R S 2009 Nano Lett. 9 4359 Google Scholar
[38]	Lee Y, Bae S, Jang H, Jang S, Zhu S E, Sim S H, Ahn J H 2010 Nano Lett. 10 490 Google Scholar
[39]	Chandrashekar B N, Deng B, Smitha A S, Chen Y, Tan C, Zhang H, Liu Z F 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 5210 Google Scholar
[40]	Kim K S, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee S Y, Kim J M, Kim K S, Ahn J H, Kim P, Choi J Y, Hong B H 2009 Nature 457 706 Google Scholar
[41]	Lin Y C, Jin C, Lee J C, Jen S F, Suenaga K, Chiu P W 2011 ACS Nano 5 2362 Google Scholar
[42]	Lin Y C, Lu C C, Yeh C H, Jin C, Suenaga K, Chiu P W 2011 Nano Lett. 12 414 Google Scholar
[43]	Bae S, Kim H, Lee Y, Xu X, Park J S, Zheng Y, Balakrishnan J, Lei T, Kim H R, Song Y I, Kim Y J, Kim K S, Ozyilmaz B, Ahn J H, Iijima S 2010 Nat. Nanotechnology 5 574 Google Scholar
[44]	Kitipornchai S, He X Q, Liew K M 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 075443 Google Scholar
[45]	Sakhaee-Pour A, Ahmadian M T, Naghdabadi R 2008 Nanotechnology 19 085702 Google Scholar
[46]	Atalaya J, Isacsson A, Kinaret J M 2008 Nano Lett. 8 4196 Google Scholar
[47]	Murmu T, Pradhan S C 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 064319 Google Scholar
[48]	Kwon O K, Lee G Y, Hwang H J, Kang J W 2012 Phys. E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 45 194 Google Scholar
[49]	Kwon O K, Lee J H, Park J, Kim K S, Kang J W 2013 Curr. Appl. Phys. B 13 360 Google Scholar
[50]	Kang J W, Hwang H J, Kim K S 2012 Comput. Mater. Sci. 65 216 Google Scholar
[51]	Kang J W, Kim H W, Kim K S, Lee J H 2013 Curr. Appl. Phys. 13 789 Google Scholar
[52]	Young K S, Cho S Y, Won K J, Kuen K O 2013 Phys. E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 54 118 Google Scholar
[53]	Bunch J S, van der Zande A M, Verbridge S S, Frank I W, Tanenbaum D M, Parpia J M, McEuen P L 2007 Science 315 490 Google Scholar
[54]	Garcia-Sanchez D, van der Zande A M, Paulo A S, Lassagne B, McEuen P L, Bachtold A 2008 Nano Lett. 8 1399 Google Scholar
[55]	Kim S Y, Park H S 2009 Nano Lett. 9 969 Google Scholar
[56]	Jiang J W, Wang J S 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 054314 Google Scholar
[57]	Chen C, Rosenblatt S, Bolotin K I, Kalb W, Kim P, Kymissis I, Hone J 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 861 Google Scholar
[58]	van der Zande A M, Barton R. A, Alden J S, Ruiz-Vargas C S, Whitney W S, Pham P H Q, McEuen P L 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4869 Google Scholar
[59]	Guan F, Kumaravadivel P, Averin D V, Du X 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 193102 Google Scholar
[60]	Barton R A, Ilic B, van der Zande A M, Whitney W S, McEuen P L, Parpia J M, Craighead H G 2011 Nano Lett. 11 1232 Google Scholar
[61]	Oshidari Y, Hatakeyama T, Kometani R, Warisawa S, Ishihara S 2012 Appl. Phys. Express 5 117201 Google Scholar
[62]	Lee S, Chen C, Deshpande V V, Lee G H, Lee I, Lekas M, Hone J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 153101 Google Scholar
[63]	Al-Mashaal A K, Wood G S, Torin A, Mastropaolo E, Newton M J, Cheung R 2018 IEEE Sens. J. 1 465 Google Scholar
[64]	Miller D, Alemán B 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 193102 Google Scholar
[65]	Bunch J S, Verbridge S S, Alden J S, van der Zande A M, Parpia J M, Craighead H G, McEuen P L 2008 Nano Lett. 8 2548 Google Scholar
[66]	Ma J, Jin W, Xuan H, Wang C, Ho H L 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 4769 Google Scholar
[67]	Dolleman R J, Davidovikj D, Cartamil-Bueno S J, van der Zant H S J, Steeneken P G 2016 Nano Lett. 16 568 Google Scholar
[68]	Vollebregt S, Dolleman R J, van der Zant H S J, et al. 2017 19 th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS) Kaohsiung, Taiwan, June 18–20, 2017 pp770–773
[69]	Li C, Lan T, Yu X, Bo N, Dong J, Fan S C 2017 Nanomaterials 7 366 Google Scholar
[70]	李子昂, 樊尚春, 李成 2019 计测技术 39 36 Google Scholar Li Z A, Fan S C, Li C 2019 Metro. Measure. Techno. 39 36 Google Scholar
[71]	Liu Y J, Li C, Fan S C, Song X F 2022 Photonic Sens. 12 140 Google Scholar
[72]	Lee M, Davidovikj D, Sajadi B, Šiškins M, Alijani F, van der Zant H S J, Steeneken P G 2019 Nano Lett. 19 5313 Google Scholar
[73]	Kang J W, Lee J H, Hwang H J, Kim K S 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 3248 Google Scholar
[74]	Byun K R, Kim K S, Hwang H J, Kang J W 2013 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 10 1886 Google Scholar
[75]	Kwon O K, Hwang H J, Kang J W 2014 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 82 280 Google Scholar
[76]	Jie W, Hu F, Wang X, Qin S 2017 Second International Conference on Photonics and Optical Engineering Xian, China, October 14–17, 2017 p102562 E
[77]	Sakhaee-Pour A, Ahmadian M T, Vafai A 2008 Solid State Commun. 145 168 Google Scholar
[78]	Atalaya J, Kinaret J M, Isacsson A 2009 EPL 91 48001 Google Scholar
[79]	Dai M, Kim C W, Eom K 2012 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7 499 Google Scholar
[80]	Jiang J W, Park H S, Rabczuk T 2012 Nanotechnology 23 475501 Google Scholar
[81]	Arash B, Wang Q, Duan W H 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 2411 Google Scholar
[82]	Lei X W, Natsuki T, Shi J X, Ni Q Q 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 154313 Google Scholar
[83]	Kwon O K, Kim K S, Park J, Kang J W 2012 Comput. Mater. Sci. 67 329 Google Scholar
[84]	Lee H L, Hsu J C, Lin S Y, Chang W J 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 123506 Google Scholar
[85]	Natsuki T, Shi J X, Ni Q Q 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 094307 Google Scholar
[86]	Gong X, Jiang S, Wang X, Liu S, Wang S 2014 15 th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Chengdu, China, August 12–15, 2014 p511
[87]	Desai S H, Pandya A A, Panchal M B 2021 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1854 012029 Google Scholar
[88]	Muruganathan M, Miyashita H, Kulothungan J, Schmidt M E, Mizuta H 2018 IEEE SENSORS Conference New Delhi, October 28–31, 2018 p1

Cited By

图 1 不同大学制作的石墨烯谐振器结构示意图　(a) 康奈尔大学^[53]; (b) 巴塞罗那自治大学^[54]; (c) 哥伦比亚大学^[57]; (d) 康奈尔大学(阵列式)^[58]; (e) 石溪大学^[59]; (f) 康奈尔大学(圆形)^[60]; (g) 东京大学^[61]; (h) 哥伦比亚大学^[62]

Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of the structure of graphene resonators made by different universities: (a) Cornell University^[53]; (b) Autonomous University of Barcelona^[54]; (c) Columbia University^[57]; (d) Cornell University (array)^[58]; (e) Shixi University^[59]; (f) Cornell University (circular)^[60]; (g) University of Tokyo^[61]; (h) Columbia University^[62].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 石墨烯谐振式压力传感器结构示意图　(a) 康奈尔大学制作的石墨烯谐振器的光学图像^[65]; (b) 香港理工大学使用的陶瓷插芯^[66]; (c) 香港理工大学使用的石墨烯纳米带^[66]; (d) 代尔夫特大学制造的哑铃形挤压膜石墨烯压力传感器^[67]; (e) 原子力显微镜下的悬浮石墨烯束, 其中氧化物为黑色, 石墨烯束为橙色^[68]; (f) 封闭腔式 F-P 谐振传感器^[69]; (g) 开放腔式 F-P 谐振传感器^[69]; (h) 单模光纤与石英毛细管熔接制成的石墨烯谐振探头^[70]; (i) 经丙酮蚀刻处理后的插芯上石墨烯膜显微图像^[71]; (j) 350 ℃退火处理的插芯上石墨烯膜显微图像^[71]; (k) 经丙酮蚀刻和退火处理的插芯上石墨烯膜显微图像^[71]

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the structure of graphene resonant pressure sensor: (a) Optical image of graphene resonator made by Cornell University^[65]; (b) ceramic ferrules used by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University^[66]; (c) graphene nanoribbons used by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University^[66]; (d) dumbbell shaped squeeze-film graphene pressure sensor made by Delft University^[67]; (e) suspended graphene beam under atomic force microscope, in which the oxide is black and the graphene beam is orange^[68]; (f) closed cavity F-P resonant sensor^[69]; (g) open cavity F-P resonant sensor^[69]; (h) graphene resonant probe made by fusion of single-mode optical fiber and quartz capillary^[70]; (i) microscopy image of graphene on the ferrule treated by acetone etching^[71]; (j) microscopy image of graphene on the ferrule treated by 350 ℃ annealing^[71]; (k) microscopy image of graphene on the ferrule treated by acetone etching and annealing^[71].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 石墨烯谐振式加速度计结构及其性能测试　(a) 韩国国立交通大学设计的石墨烯谐振式加速度计^[73]; (b) 在石墨烯谐振式加速度计上附着微小质量^[74]; (c) 不同附着质量的频率-加速度关系曲线^[74]; (d) 美国哥伦比亚大学设计的鼓式石墨烯谐振式加速度计^[62]; (e) 中国国防科技大学设计的石墨烯谐振加速度计^[76]

Figure 3. Structure and performance test of graphene resonant accelerometer: (a) Graphene resonant accelerometer designed by Korea National Jiaotong University^[73]; (b) small mass attached to graphene resonant accelerometer^[74]; (c) accelerations against frequency for different attached masses^[74]; (d) drum graphene resonant accelerometer designed by Columbia University, USA^[62]; (e) graphene resonant accelerometer designed by National University of Defense Technology, China^[76].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 石墨烯谐振式质量传感器及其性能表征　(a) 查尔姆斯理工大学设计的石墨烯谐振式质量传感器^[78]; (b) 韩国世明大学设计的石墨烯谐振式质量传感器^[83]; (c) 石墨烯谐振式质量传感器在不同边界条件下的灵敏度^[84]; (d) 单层和多层石墨烯的谐振频率-质量变化曲线^[85]; (e) 单层和多层石墨烯的谐振频移-质量变化曲线^[85]; (f) 谐振频率和频移与质量的关系曲线, 蓝色曲线表示谐振频率随石墨烯层数的变化, 红色曲线表示频移随石墨烯层数的变化^[86]

Figure 4. Graphene resonant mass sensor and its performance characterization: (a) Graphene resonant mass sensor designed by Chalmers University of Technology^[78]; (b) graphene resonant mass sensor designed by Semyung University^[83]; (c) sensitivity of graphene resonant mass sensor under different boundary conditions^[84]; (d) resonant frequency mass variation curve of monolayer/multilayer graphene films^[85]; (e) frequency shift mass curve of monolayer/multilayer graphene films^[85]; (f) relation curve of resonant frequency and frequency shift with mass, the blue curve represents the change of resonant frequency with the number of graphene layers, and the red curve is the change of frequency shift^[86].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 日本北陆先端科学技术大学制作的石墨烯谐振式质量传感器^[88]　(a)—(h) 在285 nm厚的SiO₂衬底上使用CVD法得到的石墨烯来制作石墨烯谐振器的工艺流程; (i) 制作的石墨烯谐振器光学图像

Figure 5. Process of graphene resonant mass sensor produced by Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology^[88]: (a)—(h) Schematic diagrams of top gated graphene resonator fabrication processes with CVD graphene on Si substrate with 285 nm SiO₂; (i) optical image of the fabricated top-gated graphene resonator.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 石墨烯谐振器性能指标对比

Table 1. Comparison of performance indicators of graphene resonant pressure sensors.

制备方法	层数	固支方式	谐振频率f/MHz	品质因数Q	激励方式	检测方式	实验环境 (温度, 压强P/Pa)	文献
机械剥离法	1—224	双端固支	1—170	20—850	电学/ 空间光	空间光	室温, P < 1.3×10^–4	[53]
	1	双端固支	30—120 30—120	125 14000	电学	电学	室温, P < 1.3×10^–3; 5 K, P < 1.3×10^–3	[57]
	<5	双端固支	108—122	—	电学	电学	室温, P < 6.7	[59]
	～31	圆形固支	1—30	2400±300	空间光	空间光	室温, P < 0.79	[60]
	2—5	双端固支	8—23	7000	热噪声	电学	室温, P < 10^–3	[61]
	1	圆形固支	15.7	120	空间光	空间光	室温, P = 1.013×10⁵	[64]
	1	周边固支	30—90	25	空间光	空间光	室温, P = 27—3×10⁴	[65]
	～30	圆形固支	12—16	1—100	空间光	空间光	室温, P = 8×10²—10⁵	[67]
CVD法	1	双端固支	5—75	25 9000	电学/ 空间光	电学/ 空间光	室温, P < 6.7×10^–3; 10 K, P < 6.7×10^–3	[58]
	30—60	双端固支	0.060—0.204	81—103	光纤光	光纤光	室温, P = 10^–2—10⁵	[66]
	～13	圆形固支	0.509—0.542	13.3—16.6	光纤光	光纤光	室温, P = 10⁵—2.99×10⁵	[69]

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 石墨烯谐振式压力传感器性能指标对比

Table 2. Comparison of performance indicators of graphene resonant pressure sensors.

层数/层	形状	长度或直径/μm	激励方式	检测方式	测压范围/Pa	谐振频率f	品质因数Q (室温)	压力灵敏度 (kHz·kPa^–1)	文献
1—75	正方形	4.75	空间光	空间光	10^–4—10⁵	30— 90 MHz	～25	—	[65]
多层	圆形	125	光纤光	光纤光	10^–2—10⁵	60—204 kHz	81—103	/	[66]
少层	圆形	5	空间光	空间光	8×10²—10⁵	12— 16 MHz	1—100	10—90	[67]
多层	正方形	4	空间光	空间光	10²—10⁵	15.5— 25.5 MHz	50—80	1.65—3.10	[68]
13	圆形	125	光纤光	光纤光	(1—2.99)×10⁵	509— 542 kHz	13.3—16.6	0.135	[69]
10	圆形	125	光纤光	光纤光	0—6.895×10⁴	1.43— 1.64 MHz	10.2—13.9	2.93	[70]
10	圆形	125	光纤光	光纤光	2—10⁵	481— 760 kHz	110—1034	1—110.4	[71]

DownLoad: CSV

表 3 石墨烯谐振式加速度计性能指标对比

Table 3. Comparison of performance indicators of graphene resonant accelerations.

分析方法	薄膜形状	长度或直径	激励方式	检测方式	谐振频率 f	文献
分子动力学仿真	长方形	10.8 nm×0.7 nm	电学		0—250 GHz	[73]
		12.0 nm×0.7 nm		电学	0—225 GHz	[74]
		$1.2\;{\mu }\mathrm{m}\times 1.0\;{\mu }\mathrm{m}$			0—10 MHz	[76]
实验	圆形	$3—10\;{\mu }\mathrm{m}$	电学	电学	1—10 MHz	[62]

DownLoad: CSV

表 4 石墨烯谐振式质量传感器仿真性能指标对比

Table 4. Comparison of simulation performance indicators of graphene resonant mass sensors.

实验/仿真	分析方法	薄膜形状	检测目标	谐振频率f	可检测到的最小质量/(10^–21 g)	品质因数Q	文献
仿真	分子结构力学仿真	长方形	质点/原子尘埃	0—104 GHz	1	—	[77]
	分子动力学仿真	正方形	惰性气体原子	—	1	—	[81]
	有限元模拟	圆形	质点	～0—200 GHz	1	—	[86]
	连续弹性介质模型和瑞利能量法	圆形	质点	0—105 GHz	10^–3	—	[82]
	分子动力学仿真	长方形	纳米粒子	0—230 GHz	10^–3	—	[83]
	连续弹性介质模型	正方形	纳米粒子	0—105 GHz	10	—	[85]
	薄膜理论和有限元模拟	长方形	烟草花叶病毒	～200—1500 MHz	—	—	[87]
实验	—	长方形	氩氢混合气	95.5 MHz	886	45	[88]

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Tabata O, Yamamoto T 1999 Sensors and Actuators 75 53 Google Scholar
[2]	樊尚春, 朱黎明, 邢维巍 2019 计测技术 39 4 Google Scholar Fan S C, Zhu L M, Xing W W 2019 Metrology and Measurement Technology 39 4 Google Scholar
[3]	Stachiv I, Gan L 2019 Materials 21 3593 Google Scholar
[4]	Su S X P, Yang H S, Agino A M 2005 IEEE Sens. J. 5 1214 Google Scholar
[5]	Nie J, Meng X, Li N, Lin L 2017 Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 256 1 Google Scholar
[6]	Yu X, Chen X, Ding X, Zhao X 2017 IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 67 1 Google Scholar
[7]	Li C, Zhang Q W, Zhao Y L, Tian C, Li B, Han C, Bai B 2021 J. Micromech. Microeng. 31 115001 Google Scholar
[8]	John G, Troy W 1993 Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 37 82 Google Scholar
[9]	Ikeda K, Kuwayama H, Kobayashi T, Watanabe T, Nishikawa T, Yoshida T, Harada K 1990 Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 21 146 Google Scholar
[10]	Chen F, Gao J, Tian W 2017 Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 269 427 Google Scholar
[11]	Lei F, Dupuis P, Durrieu O, Zissis G, Maussion P 2017 IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 53 5988 Google Scholar
[12]	樊尚春, 孙苗苗, 李成 2012 传感技术学报 25 1 Google Scholar Fan S C, Sun M M, Li C 2012 J. Trans. Technology 25 1 Google Scholar
[13]	Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 5696 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhang Y B, Tan Y W, Stormer H L, Kim P 2005 Nature 438 201 Google Scholar
[15]	Geim A K, Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183 Google Scholar
[16]	Geim A K 2009 Science 324 1530 Google Scholar
[17]	Rao C N, Sood A K, Subrahmanyam K S, Govindaraj A 2010 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48 7752 Google Scholar
[18]	Smith B R, Conger M J, Mcmullen J S, Neubert M J 2019 J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 11 1 Google Scholar
[19]	Cabrera H, Mendoza D, Benítez J L, Bautista F C, Alvarado S, Marín E 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 465501 Google Scholar
[20]	De S, Coleman J N 2010 Acs Nano. 4 2713 Google Scholar
[21]	Nika D L, Askerov A S, Balandin A A 2012 Nano Lett. 12 3238 Google Scholar
[22]	Pang C, Lee G Y, Kim T I, Sang M K, Hong N K, Ann S H, Sun K Y 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 795 Google Scholar
[23]	Ding G, Li X, Xu Z, Chen H, Wang M 2021 IEEE Electr. Device Lett. 42 236 Google Scholar
[24]	Jung M. W, Myung S, Kim K W, Song W, Jo Y Y, Lee S S, Lim J, Park C Y, An K S 2014 Nanotechnology 25 285302 Google Scholar
[25]	Jaakkola K, Sandberg H, Lahti M, Ermolov V 2019 IEEE Trans. Compon. Pack. Manuf. Technol. 9 1 Google Scholar
[26]	Lee H, Choi T K, Lee Y B, Cho H R, Ghaffari R, Wang L, Kim D H 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 566 Google Scholar
[27]	Seo D H, Pineda S, Fang J, Gozukara Y, Yick S, Bendavid A. Lam S K H, Murdock A T, Murphy A B, Han Z J 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14217 Google Scholar
[28]	黄乐, 张志勇, 彭练矛 2017 物理学报 66 218501 Google Scholar Huang L, Zhang Z Y, Peng L M 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 218501 Google Scholar
[29]	赵鹏程, 樊尚春 2017 计测技术 37 4 Google Scholar Zhao P C, Fan S C 2017 Metro. Measure. Technol. 37 4 Google Scholar
[30]	Stankovich S, Dikin D A, Piner R D, Kohlhaas K A, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Ruoff R S 2007 Carbon 45 1558 Google Scholar
[31]	Ju H M, Huh S H, Choi S H, Lee H L 2010 Mater. Lett. 64 357 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang H, Robinson J T, Li X, Dai H 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 9910 Google Scholar
[33]	Reina A, Jia X, Ho J, Nezich D, Son H, Bulovic V, Kong J 2009 Nano Lett. 9 3087 Google Scholar
[34]	Li X, Cai W, An J, Kim S, Nah J, Yang D, Ruoff R S 2009 Science 324 1312 Google Scholar
[35]	Sprinkle M, Ruan, Hu Y, Hankinson J, Rubio-Roy M, Zhang B, Wu X, Berger C, de Heer W A 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 727 Google Scholar
[36]	Liang X, Sperling B A, Calizo I, Cheng G, Hacker C A, Zhang Q, Richter C A 2011 ACS Nano. 22 9144 Google Scholar
[37]	Li X, Zhu Y, Cai W, Borysiak M, Han B, Chen D, Ruoff R S 2009 Nano Lett. 9 4359 Google Scholar
[38]	Lee Y, Bae S, Jang H, Jang S, Zhu S E, Sim S H, Ahn J H 2010 Nano Lett. 10 490 Google Scholar
[39]	Chandrashekar B N, Deng B, Smitha A S, Chen Y, Tan C, Zhang H, Liu Z F 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 5210 Google Scholar
[40]	Kim K S, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee S Y, Kim J M, Kim K S, Ahn J H, Kim P, Choi J Y, Hong B H 2009 Nature 457 706 Google Scholar
[41]	Lin Y C, Jin C, Lee J C, Jen S F, Suenaga K, Chiu P W 2011 ACS Nano 5 2362 Google Scholar
[42]	Lin Y C, Lu C C, Yeh C H, Jin C, Suenaga K, Chiu P W 2011 Nano Lett. 12 414 Google Scholar
[43]	Bae S, Kim H, Lee Y, Xu X, Park J S, Zheng Y, Balakrishnan J, Lei T, Kim H R, Song Y I, Kim Y J, Kim K S, Ozyilmaz B, Ahn J H, Iijima S 2010 Nat. Nanotechnology 5 574 Google Scholar
[44]	Kitipornchai S, He X Q, Liew K M 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 075443 Google Scholar
[45]	Sakhaee-Pour A, Ahmadian M T, Naghdabadi R 2008 Nanotechnology 19 085702 Google Scholar
[46]	Atalaya J, Isacsson A, Kinaret J M 2008 Nano Lett. 8 4196 Google Scholar
[47]	Murmu T, Pradhan S C 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 064319 Google Scholar
[48]	Kwon O K, Lee G Y, Hwang H J, Kang J W 2012 Phys. E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 45 194 Google Scholar
[49]	Kwon O K, Lee J H, Park J, Kim K S, Kang J W 2013 Curr. Appl. Phys. B 13 360 Google Scholar
[50]	Kang J W, Hwang H J, Kim K S 2012 Comput. Mater. Sci. 65 216 Google Scholar
[51]	Kang J W, Kim H W, Kim K S, Lee J H 2013 Curr. Appl. Phys. 13 789 Google Scholar
[52]	Young K S, Cho S Y, Won K J, Kuen K O 2013 Phys. E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 54 118 Google Scholar
[53]	Bunch J S, van der Zande A M, Verbridge S S, Frank I W, Tanenbaum D M, Parpia J M, McEuen P L 2007 Science 315 490 Google Scholar
[54]	Garcia-Sanchez D, van der Zande A M, Paulo A S, Lassagne B, McEuen P L, Bachtold A 2008 Nano Lett. 8 1399 Google Scholar
[55]	Kim S Y, Park H S 2009 Nano Lett. 9 969 Google Scholar
[56]	Jiang J W, Wang J S 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 054314 Google Scholar
[57]	Chen C, Rosenblatt S, Bolotin K I, Kalb W, Kim P, Kymissis I, Hone J 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 861 Google Scholar
[58]	van der Zande A M, Barton R. A, Alden J S, Ruiz-Vargas C S, Whitney W S, Pham P H Q, McEuen P L 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4869 Google Scholar
[59]	Guan F, Kumaravadivel P, Averin D V, Du X 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 193102 Google Scholar
[60]	Barton R A, Ilic B, van der Zande A M, Whitney W S, McEuen P L, Parpia J M, Craighead H G 2011 Nano Lett. 11 1232 Google Scholar
[61]	Oshidari Y, Hatakeyama T, Kometani R, Warisawa S, Ishihara S 2012 Appl. Phys. Express 5 117201 Google Scholar
[62]	Lee S, Chen C, Deshpande V V, Lee G H, Lee I, Lekas M, Hone J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 153101 Google Scholar
[63]	Al-Mashaal A K, Wood G S, Torin A, Mastropaolo E, Newton M J, Cheung R 2018 IEEE Sens. J. 1 465 Google Scholar
[64]	Miller D, Alemán B 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 193102 Google Scholar
[65]	Bunch J S, Verbridge S S, Alden J S, van der Zande A M, Parpia J M, Craighead H G, McEuen P L 2008 Nano Lett. 8 2548 Google Scholar
[66]	Ma J, Jin W, Xuan H, Wang C, Ho H L 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 4769 Google Scholar
[67]	Dolleman R J, Davidovikj D, Cartamil-Bueno S J, van der Zant H S J, Steeneken P G 2016 Nano Lett. 16 568 Google Scholar
[68]	Vollebregt S, Dolleman R J, van der Zant H S J, et al. 2017 19 th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS) Kaohsiung, Taiwan, June 18–20, 2017 pp770–773
[69]	Li C, Lan T, Yu X, Bo N, Dong J, Fan S C 2017 Nanomaterials 7 366 Google Scholar
[70]	李子昂, 樊尚春, 李成 2019 计测技术 39 36 Google Scholar Li Z A, Fan S C, Li C 2019 Metro. Measure. Techno. 39 36 Google Scholar
[71]	Liu Y J, Li C, Fan S C, Song X F 2022 Photonic Sens. 12 140 Google Scholar
[72]	Lee M, Davidovikj D, Sajadi B, Šiškins M, Alijani F, van der Zant H S J, Steeneken P G 2019 Nano Lett. 19 5313 Google Scholar
[73]	Kang J W, Lee J H, Hwang H J, Kim K S 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 3248 Google Scholar
[74]	Byun K R, Kim K S, Hwang H J, Kang J W 2013 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 10 1886 Google Scholar
[75]	Kwon O K, Hwang H J, Kang J W 2014 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 82 280 Google Scholar
[76]	Jie W, Hu F, Wang X, Qin S 2017 Second International Conference on Photonics and Optical Engineering Xian, China, October 14–17, 2017 p102562 E
[77]	Sakhaee-Pour A, Ahmadian M T, Vafai A 2008 Solid State Commun. 145 168 Google Scholar
[78]	Atalaya J, Kinaret J M, Isacsson A 2009 EPL 91 48001 Google Scholar
[79]	Dai M, Kim C W, Eom K 2012 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7 499 Google Scholar
[80]	Jiang J W, Park H S, Rabczuk T 2012 Nanotechnology 23 475501 Google Scholar
[81]	Arash B, Wang Q, Duan W H 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 2411 Google Scholar
[82]	Lei X W, Natsuki T, Shi J X, Ni Q Q 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 154313 Google Scholar
[83]	Kwon O K, Kim K S, Park J, Kang J W 2012 Comput. Mater. Sci. 67 329 Google Scholar
[84]	Lee H L, Hsu J C, Lin S Y, Chang W J 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 123506 Google Scholar
[85]	Natsuki T, Shi J X, Ni Q Q 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 094307 Google Scholar
[86]	Gong X, Jiang S, Wang X, Liu S, Wang S 2014 15 th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology Chengdu, China, August 12–15, 2014 p511
[87]	Desai S H, Pandya A A, Panchal M B 2021 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1854 012029 Google Scholar
[88]	Muruganathan M, Miyashita H, Kulothungan J, Schmidt M E, Mizuta H 2018 IEEE SENSORS Conference New Delhi, October 28–31, 2018 p1

[1]	Zheng Qin-Ren, Zhan Fu-Zhi, She Jun-Yi, Wang Jian-Yu, Shi Ruo-Li, Meng Guo-Dong. Influence of morphological characteristics of graphene on its field emission properties. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(8): 086101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231784
[2]	Liao Tian-Jun, Yang Zhi-Min, Lin Bi-Hong. Performance optimization of graphene thermionicdevices based on charge and heat transport. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(22): 227901. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211110
[3]	Dong Hui-Ying, Qin Xiao-Ru, Xue Wen-Rui, Cheng Xin, Li Ning, Li Chang-Yong. Mode characteristics of asymmetric graphene-coated elliptical dielectric nano-parallel wires waveguide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(23): 238102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201041
[4]	Zhang Na, Liu Bo, Lin Li-Wei. Effect of He ion irradiation on microstructure and electrical properties of graphene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(1): 016101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191344
[5]	Cheng Xin, Xue Wen-Rui, Wei Zhuang-Zhi, Dong Hui-Ying, Li Chang-Yong. Mode characteristic analysis of optical waveguides based on graphene-coated elliptical dielectric nanowire. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(5): 058101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182090
[6]	Wei Zhuang-Zhi, Xue Wen-Rui, Peng Yan-Ling, Cheng Xin, Li Chang-Yong. Modes characteristics analysis of THz waveguides based on three graphene-coated dielectric nanowires. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(10): 108101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180036
[7]	Peng Yan-Ling, Xue Wen-Rui, Wei Zhuang-Zhi, Li Chang-Yong. Mode properties analysis of graphene-coated asymmetric parallel dielectric nanowire waveguides. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 038102. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172016
[8]	Mo Jun, Feng Guo-Ying, Yang Mo-Chou, Liao Yu, Zhou Hao, Zhou Shou-Huan^1\2. Graphene-based broadband all-optical spatial modulator. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(21): 214201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180307
[9]	Han Tong-Wei, Li Pan-Pan. Investigation on the large tensile deformation and mechanical behaviors of graphene kirigami. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(6): 066201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.066201
[10]	Yang Wen-Long, Han Jun-Sheng, Wang Yu, Lin Jia-Qi, He Guo-Qiang, Sun Hong-Guo. Molecular dynamics simulation on the glass transition temperature and mechanical properties of polyimide/functional graphene composites. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(22): 227101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.227101
[11]	Huang Le, Zhang Zhi-Yong, Peng Lian-Mao. High performance graphene Hall sensors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(21): 218501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.218501
[12]	Cheng Zheng-Fu, Zheng Rui-Lun. Influence of the anharmonic vibration on the Young modulus and the phonon frequency of the graphene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(10): 104701. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.104701
[13]	Yang Jing-Jing, Li Jun-Jie, Deng Wei, Cheng Cheng, Huang Ming. Transmission mode of a single layer graphene and its performance in the detection of the vibration spectrum of gas molecular. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(19): 198102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.198102
[14]	Ye Peng-Fei, Chen Hai-Tao, Bu Liang-Min, Zhang Kun, Han Jiu-Rong. Synthesis of SnO2 quantum dots/graphene composite and its photocatalytic performance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(7): 078102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.078102
[15]	Xu Jie, Zhou Li, Huang Zhi-Xiang, Wu Xian-Liang. Study on the absorbing properties of critically coupled resonator with graphene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(23): 238103. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.238103
[16]	Xu Zhi-Cheng, Zhong Wei-Rong. Transient kinetics of graphene bombarded by fullerene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(8): 083401. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.083401
[17]	Zhao Long, Yan Ting-Jun. Positioning performance evaluation of magnetic contour matching under different accuracy of sensor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(6): 067702. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.067702
[18]	Han Tong-Wei, He Peng-Fei. Molecular dynamics simulation of relaxation properties of graphene sheets. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(5): 3408-3413. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3408
[19]	Yang Rui, Xie Yong-Jun, Li Xiao-Feng, Jiang Jun, Wang Yuan-Yuan, Wang Rui. Floquet mode analysis on the resonance behavior of metamaterials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(2): 901-907. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.901
[20]	Yang Fan, Wen Yu-Mei, Li Ping, Zheng Min, Bian Lei-Xiang. The resonant magnetoelectric response of magnetostrictive/piezoelectric laminated composite under the consideration of losses. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(6): 3539-3545. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3539

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 12 - 2022-06-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 7432
PDF Downloads: 217
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板