-
The coupling vibration of large-scale piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer will make the average value of the longitudinal displacement amplitude of its radiation surface small and the amplitude distribution uneven, which seriously affects the performance and reliability of the system. In order to improve the performance of large-scale ultrasonic vibration system, a two-dimensional hole/slot near-periodic phononic crystal structure is used to suppress the transverse vibration, but the structure will in turn affect the mechanical strength of the transducer while achieving the suppression of the transverse vibration. The working bandwidth and other performance parameters have adverse effects. Based on this, a new idea of optimizing the large-scale sandwich longitudinal vibration piezoelectric ceramic transducer by using the tubular near-periodic phononic crystal point defect structure is proposed. This method can not only use the point defect mode of the constructed solid/gas two-dimensional near-periodic phononic crystal structure to obtain extremely low energy loss, but also effectively improve the longitudinal displacement amplitude and amplitude distribution uniformity of the radiation surface of the system. The double annular holes in the pipe string structure can also be used to enhance the multiple scattering of sound waves, so that the transducer can also produce a band gap under the low conditions of the pipe string, effectively suppressing the transverse vibration, at the same time, significantly broadening the working bandwidth of the transducer system, enhancing the stability and mechanical strength of the system, and reducing the processing cost. Simulation results and experimental processing test results also prove the effectiveness of the optimization. In order to find the best parameters for the performance of the large-scale longitudinal vibration piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer, in the paper the finite element analysis software is used to study the influence of the inner radius r1 of the pipe string, the width r of the pipe string ring, the radius R of the outermost air cylinder hole, and the height h2 of the pipe string at the longitudinal resonance frequency of the transducer performance, the longitudinal displacement amplitude distribution uniformity of the radiation surface, and the average longitudinal displacement amplitude. In the research is finally found the range of parameters that can make the performance of the transducer reach a relatively ideal state. The simulation results show that the tubular near-periodic phononic crystal point defect structure can improve the performance of large-scale longitudinal vibration piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer. -
Keywords:
- transverse vibration /
- performance of large-scale piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer /
- tubular near-periodic phononic crystal point defect structure
[1] 刘晓晗, 黄大鸣, 王兴军, 张春红, 朱海军, 蒋最敏, 王迅 1997 物理学报 46 200Google Scholar
Liu X H, Huang D M, Wang X J, Zhang C H, Zhu H J, Jiang Z M, Wang X 1997 Acta Phys. Sin. 46 200Google Scholar
[2] Sigalas M M, Economou E N 1992 J. Sound Vib. 158 377Google Scholar
[3] Kushwaha M S, Halevi P, Dobrzynski L, Djafari-Rouhani B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2022Google Scholar
[4] Adibi A, Lee R K 2002 Elec. Lett. 36 1376Google Scholar
[5] Wang Y F, Wang Y S 2013 J. Vib. Acoust. 135 041009Google Scholar
[6] Das S, Dwivedi K, Rajasekharan S G, Rao Y 2021 J. Vib. Control 27 827Google Scholar
[7] Yang S, Yu W D, Pan N 2011 Physica B 406 963Google Scholar
[8] Hsu J C, Wu T T 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 144303Google Scholar
[9] Khelif A, Aoubiza B, Mohammadi S, Adibi A, Laude V 2006 Phys. Rev. E 74 046610Google Scholar
[10] Benchabane S, Gaiffe O, Salut R, Ulliac G, Laude V, Kokkonen K 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 081903Google Scholar
[11] Ma T X, Fan Q S, Zhang C, Wang Y S 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 129 145104Google Scholar
[12] Wu F, Hou Z, Liu Z, Liu Y 2001 Phys. Lett. A 292 198Google Scholar
[13] Miyashita T 2014 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45 4440Google Scholar
[14] Li F, Liu J, Wu Y H 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 124907Google Scholar
[15] Li Y G, Chen T N, Wang X, Ma T, Ping J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 0249041Google Scholar
[16] Lin S 2009 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56 1990Google Scholar
[17] Lin S 1995 Appl. Acoust. 44 249Google Scholar
[18] Ren S C 1983 Acta Acust. 1 152Google Scholar
[19] Rani M R, Prakasan K, Rudramoorthy R 2014 Inter. J. Desi. Eng. 5 344Google Scholar
[20] Adachi K, Ueha S 1990 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 208Google Scholar
[21] 王莎, 林书玉 2019 物理学报 68 024303Google Scholar
Wang S, Lin S Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 024303Google Scholar
[22] Wang S, Lin S 2019 Ultra. 99 105954Google Scholar
[23] 赵甜甜, 林书玉, 段祎林 2018 物理学报 67 224207Google Scholar
Zhao T T, Lin S Y, Duan Y L 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 224207Google Scholar
[24] Zhao T T, Lin S Y 2019 Acta Acust. United Acust. 105 953Google Scholar
[25] 王莎, 林书玉, 段祎林 2018 应用声学 37 811Google Scholar
Wang S, Lin S Y, Duan Y L 2018 Appl. Acoust. 37 811Google Scholar
[26] Hu L Q, Wang S, Lin S Y 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 054302Google Scholar
[27] 林基艳, 林书玉 2022 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版) 50 117Google Scholar
Lin J Y, Lin S Y 2022 J. Shaanxi Norm. Uni. (Natural Science Edition) 50 117Google Scholar
[28] 胡理情, 林书玉 2021 应用声学 40 323Google Scholar
Hu L Q, Lin S Y 2021 Appl. Acoust. 40 323Google Scholar
[29] Lin J Y, Lin S Y 2020 Cryst. 10 21Google Scholar
[30] 林基艳, 林书玉, 王升, 李耀 2021 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 51 094311Google Scholar
Lin J Y, Lin S Y, Wang S, Li Y 2021 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 094311Google Scholar
[31] 魏琦, 程营, 刘晓峻 2011 物理学报 60 124301Google Scholar
Wei Q, Cheng Y, Liu X J 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 124301Google Scholar
[32] Mohammadi S, Eftekhar A. A, Khelif A, Hunt W D, Adibi A 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 221905Google Scholar
[33] Wu T T, Huang Z G, Tsai T C, Wu T C 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 111902Google Scholar
[34] Pennec Y, Djafari-Rouhani B, Larabi H, Vasseur J O, Hladky-Hennion A C 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 104105Google Scholar
[35] Pourabolghasem R, Khelif A, Mohammadi S, Eftekhar A A, Adibi A A 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 013514Google Scholar
[36] 舒风风 2016 博士学位论文 (长春: 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所)
Shu F F 2016 Ph. D. Dissertation (Changchun: Changchun Institute of Optics, Precision Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (in Chinese)
-
图 7 管柱型近周期声子晶体点缺陷结构的大尺寸压电超声换能器的(a)结构示意图、(b)振型图及(c)辐射面位移分布云图
Figure 7. (a) Structure schematic, (b) vibration modal diagram, and (c) cloud diagram of displacement distribution of radiation surface of large-scale piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers with tubular near-period phononic crystal point defect structure.
表 1 换能器的结构尺寸和材料属性参数
Table 1. Structural size and material property parameters of the transducer.
部件 材料属性 形状 外/大端半径/mm 内/小端半径/mm 高度/mm 前盖板 Aluminum 6063-T83 圆锥 50 31 35 压电陶瓷片(两片) PZT-4 等截面圆环 30 7 8 后盖板 Steel AISI 4340 等截面圆柱 31 31 30 -
[1] 刘晓晗, 黄大鸣, 王兴军, 张春红, 朱海军, 蒋最敏, 王迅 1997 物理学报 46 200Google Scholar
Liu X H, Huang D M, Wang X J, Zhang C H, Zhu H J, Jiang Z M, Wang X 1997 Acta Phys. Sin. 46 200Google Scholar
[2] Sigalas M M, Economou E N 1992 J. Sound Vib. 158 377Google Scholar
[3] Kushwaha M S, Halevi P, Dobrzynski L, Djafari-Rouhani B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2022Google Scholar
[4] Adibi A, Lee R K 2002 Elec. Lett. 36 1376Google Scholar
[5] Wang Y F, Wang Y S 2013 J. Vib. Acoust. 135 041009Google Scholar
[6] Das S, Dwivedi K, Rajasekharan S G, Rao Y 2021 J. Vib. Control 27 827Google Scholar
[7] Yang S, Yu W D, Pan N 2011 Physica B 406 963Google Scholar
[8] Hsu J C, Wu T T 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 144303Google Scholar
[9] Khelif A, Aoubiza B, Mohammadi S, Adibi A, Laude V 2006 Phys. Rev. E 74 046610Google Scholar
[10] Benchabane S, Gaiffe O, Salut R, Ulliac G, Laude V, Kokkonen K 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 081903Google Scholar
[11] Ma T X, Fan Q S, Zhang C, Wang Y S 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 129 145104Google Scholar
[12] Wu F, Hou Z, Liu Z, Liu Y 2001 Phys. Lett. A 292 198Google Scholar
[13] Miyashita T 2014 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45 4440Google Scholar
[14] Li F, Liu J, Wu Y H 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 124907Google Scholar
[15] Li Y G, Chen T N, Wang X, Ma T, Ping J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 0249041Google Scholar
[16] Lin S 2009 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56 1990Google Scholar
[17] Lin S 1995 Appl. Acoust. 44 249Google Scholar
[18] Ren S C 1983 Acta Acust. 1 152Google Scholar
[19] Rani M R, Prakasan K, Rudramoorthy R 2014 Inter. J. Desi. Eng. 5 344Google Scholar
[20] Adachi K, Ueha S 1990 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 208Google Scholar
[21] 王莎, 林书玉 2019 物理学报 68 024303Google Scholar
Wang S, Lin S Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 024303Google Scholar
[22] Wang S, Lin S 2019 Ultra. 99 105954Google Scholar
[23] 赵甜甜, 林书玉, 段祎林 2018 物理学报 67 224207Google Scholar
Zhao T T, Lin S Y, Duan Y L 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 224207Google Scholar
[24] Zhao T T, Lin S Y 2019 Acta Acust. United Acust. 105 953Google Scholar
[25] 王莎, 林书玉, 段祎林 2018 应用声学 37 811Google Scholar
Wang S, Lin S Y, Duan Y L 2018 Appl. Acoust. 37 811Google Scholar
[26] Hu L Q, Wang S, Lin S Y 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 054302Google Scholar
[27] 林基艳, 林书玉 2022 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版) 50 117Google Scholar
Lin J Y, Lin S Y 2022 J. Shaanxi Norm. Uni. (Natural Science Edition) 50 117Google Scholar
[28] 胡理情, 林书玉 2021 应用声学 40 323Google Scholar
Hu L Q, Lin S Y 2021 Appl. Acoust. 40 323Google Scholar
[29] Lin J Y, Lin S Y 2020 Cryst. 10 21Google Scholar
[30] 林基艳, 林书玉, 王升, 李耀 2021 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 51 094311Google Scholar
Lin J Y, Lin S Y, Wang S, Li Y 2021 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 094311Google Scholar
[31] 魏琦, 程营, 刘晓峻 2011 物理学报 60 124301Google Scholar
Wei Q, Cheng Y, Liu X J 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 124301Google Scholar
[32] Mohammadi S, Eftekhar A. A, Khelif A, Hunt W D, Adibi A 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 221905Google Scholar
[33] Wu T T, Huang Z G, Tsai T C, Wu T C 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 111902Google Scholar
[34] Pennec Y, Djafari-Rouhani B, Larabi H, Vasseur J O, Hladky-Hennion A C 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 104105Google Scholar
[35] Pourabolghasem R, Khelif A, Mohammadi S, Eftekhar A A, Adibi A A 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 013514Google Scholar
[36] 舒风风 2016 博士学位论文 (长春: 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所)
Shu F F 2016 Ph. D. Dissertation (Changchun: Changchun Institute of Optics, Precision Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (in Chinese)
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2977
- PDF Downloads: 107
- Cited By: 0