铁酸铋薄膜光电流的磁场调制研究

霍冠忠; 苏超; 王可; 叶晴莹; 庄彬; 陈水源; 黄志高

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20222053

摘要

BiFeO₃作为一种具有体光伏效应的室温多铁材料, 是近年来多功能材料领域的研究热点. 其中磁、光、电等多种性能之间耦合作用的共存带来了丰富而复杂的物理内涵. 利用脉冲激光沉积在导电玻璃(SnO₂:F, FTO)衬底上沉积了BiFeO₃薄膜, 实验结果表明, 该薄膜具有良好的铁磁和铁电性能, 并通过磁场实现了对薄膜光电性能的调控. 在标准太阳光照的同时施加1.3 kOe (1 Oe = 10³/(4π) A/m)磁场下, 磁-光电流变化率达到232.7%. BiFeO₃薄膜中的磁-光电流效应来自于光磁电阻效应, 即光生电子在磁场作用下成为自旋光电子, 在材料导带运动过程中受到自旋相关散射而具有光磁电阻效应; 此外, 磁场作用使这些自旋光电子受到的畴壁散射减弱也进一步增强了磁光电流效应. 本文为磁场、光场调控多铁性薄膜的磁、光、电等物理特性提供了参考, 为多功能光电材料领域的器件研究与应用提供了基础.

关键词:

铁酸铋 /
光伏效应 /
磁场 /
自旋电子

Abstract

BiFeO₃ (BFO) is a kind of room temperature multiferroic material with bulk photovoltaic effect, and it has been a research hotspot in the field of multifunctional materials in recent years. The coexistence of the coupling among magnetic, optical, electrical properties brings rich and complex physical connotations. In this work, BiFeO₃ thin film is deposited on FTO substrate by pulsed laser deposition, and the solar cell structure with BiFeO₃ film used as light absorption layer and Au film serving as electrode is constructed. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectra indicate that the BFO film grown on FTO substrate has a pure phase structure. The experimental results of physical properties indicate that the BFO film possesses good ferromagnetic and ferroelectric properties and obvious photoelectric effect. According to the hysteresis loop, the remanence (M_r) of the sample is 0.8 emu/cm³, and the coercivity (H_c) is 200 Oe at 300 K. In terms of ferroelectricity, the saturation polarization intensity of the sample can reach 0.997 μC/cm², the residual polarization intensity is 0.337 μC/cm², and the coercive electric field is 12.45 kV/cm. The above results show that the BFO film has good multiferroic properties. Under solar illumination conditions, the photocurrent density up to 208 mA/cm² is obtained when a bias voltage 1 V is applied. More importantly, magneto-photocurrent (MPC) effect is found in the BFO film. No matter whether the magnetic field starts to increase from the positive direction or the negative direction, the MPC usually changes with the magnitude of magnetization. When a 1.3 kOe magnetic field is applied, the magneto-photocurrent change rate up to 232.7% is observed under standard solar illumination condition. The results show that the photocurrent of BFO films is greatly improved by a positive magnetic field and negative magnetic field. This magneto-photocurrent effect in BFO thin film comes from the photo-magnetoresistance effect, that is, the photogenerated electrons become spin photoelectrons under the action of an external magnetic field and receive spin-dependent scattering during moving in the conductive band of the material, thus producing the photo-magnetoresistance effect. In addition, the magneto-photocurrent effect is further enhanced by weakening the domain wall scattering of the spin electrons by the magnetic field. This work provides a reference for the modulation effect of magnetic field and light field on the magnetic, optical and electrical properties in multiferroics, and presents a foundation for the research and application of devices in the field of multifunctional optoelectronic materials.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
福建省量子调控与新能源材料重点实验室, 福建省太阳能转换与储能工程技术研究中心, 福州　350117

2.
福建师范大学物理与能源学院, 福州　350117

通信作者: 陈水源, sychen@fjnu.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11074031)、国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2017YFE0301401)和福建省自然科学基金(批准号: 2020J01192, 2021J01191)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Manipulation and New Energy Materials, Fujian Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Solar Energy Conversion and Energy Storage, Fuzhou 350117, China

2.
College of Physics and Energy, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China

Corresponding author: Chen Shui-Yuan, sychen@fjnu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11074031), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFE0301401), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant Nos. 2020J01192, 2021J01191).

文章全文

参考文献

[1]	Guo R, You L, Zhou Y, Shiuh L Z, Zou X, Chen L, Ramesh R, Wang J L 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1990 Google Scholar
[2]	Wei M C, Liu M F, Yang L, Xie B, Li X, Wang X Z, Cheng X Y, Zhu Y D, Li Z J, Su Y L, Li M Y, Hu Z Q, Liu J M 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 5126 Google Scholar
[3]	Thakoor S 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 3319 Google Scholar
[4]	张亚菊, 谢忠帅, 郑海务, 袁国亮 2020 物理学报 69 127709 Google Scholar Zhang Y J, Xie Z S, Zheng H W, Yuan G L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 127709 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang J, Ma J, Yang Y B, Chen M F, Zhang J X, Ma J, Nan C W 2019 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 1 862 Google Scholar
[6]	Li J K, Ge C, Jin K J, Du J Y, Yang J T, Lu H B, Yang G Z 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 142901 Google Scholar
[7]	Wang X D, Wang P, Wang J L, Hu W D, Zhou X H, Guo N, Huang H, Sun S, Shen H, Lin T, Tang M H, Liao L, Jiang A Q, Sun J L, Meng X J, Chen X S, Lu W, Chu J H 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 6575 Google Scholar
[8]	Wang P, Wang Y, Ye L, Wu M Z, Xie R Z, Wang X D, Chen X S, Fan Z Y, Wang J L, Hu W D 2018 Small 14 e1800492 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhao Q L, He G P, Di J J, Song W L, Hou Z L, Tan P P, Wang D W, Cao M S 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 24696 Google Scholar
[10]	Sujoy K G, Jinyoung K, Minsoo P K, Sangyun N, Jeonghoon C, Jae J K, Hyunhyub K 2022 ACS Nano 16 11415 Google Scholar
[11]	Huangfu G, Xiao H, Guan L, Zhong H, Hu C, Shi Z, Guo Y 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 33950 Google Scholar
[12]	Tan Z W, Hong L Q, Fan Z, Tian J J, Zhang L Y, Jiang Y, Hou Z P, Chen D Y, Qin M H, Zeng M, Gao J W, Lu X B, Zhou G F, Gao X S, Liu J M 2019 NPG Asia Mater. 11 20 Google Scholar
[13]	Nechache R, Harnagea C, Li S, Cardenas L, Huang W, Chakrabartty J, Rosei F 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 61 Google Scholar
[14]	Grinberg I, West D V, Torres M, Gou G Y, Stein D M, Wu L Y, Chen G N, Gallo E M, Akbashev A R, Davies P K, Spanier J E, Rappe A M 2013 Nature 503 509 Google Scholar
[15]	Chakrabartty J, Harnagea C, Celikin M, Rosei F, Nechache R 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 271 Google Scholar
[16]	Liu C C, Sun H Y, Ma C, Chen Z W, Luo Z, Su T S, Yin Y W, Li X G 2020 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 41 42 Google Scholar
[17]	Liu Y, Yao Y, Dong S, Yang S, Li X 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 075113 Google Scholar
[18]	Fan Z, Yao K, Wang J 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 162903 Google Scholar
[19]	Basu S R, Martin L W, Chu Y H, Gajek M, Ramesh R, Rai R C, Xu X, Musfeldt J L 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 091905 Google Scholar
[20]	Ema K, Umeda K, Toda M, Yajima C, Arai Y, Kunugita H, Wolverson D, Davies J J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 241310 Google Scholar
[21]	Hsiao Y C, Wu T, Li M, Hu B 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 2899 Google Scholar
[22]	Pavliuk M V, Fernandes D L A, El-Zohry A M, Abdellah M, Nedelcu G, Kovalenko M V, Sa J 2016 Adv. Opt. Mater. 4 2004 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang C, Sun D, Sheng C X, Zhai Y X, Mielczarek K, Zakhidov A, Vardeny Z V 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 427 Google Scholar
[24]	Even J, Pedesseau L, Jancu J M, Katan C 2014 Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 8 31 Google Scholar
[25]	Pan R, Wang K, Li Y, Yu H, Li J, Xu L 2021 Adv. Electron. Mater. 7 2100026 Google Scholar
[26]	Andy E 2019 Nature 570 429 Google Scholar
[27]	Tomas L, Kevin A B, Rohit P, Michael D M 2018 Nat. Energy 3 828 Google Scholar
[28]	Kevin A B, Axel F P, Zhengshan J Y, Mathieu B, Rongrong C, Jonathan P M, David P M, Robert L Z H, Colin D B, Tomas L, Ian M P, Maxmillian C M, Nicholas R, Rohit P, Sarah S, Duncan H, Wen M, Farhad M, Henry J S, Tonio B, Zachary C H, Stacey F B, Michael D M 2017 Nat. Energy 2 17009 Google Scholar
[29]	Florent S, Jérémie W, Brett A K, Matthias B, Raphaël M, Bertrand P S, Loris B, Laura D, Juan J D L, Davide S, Gianluca C, Matthieu D, Mathieu B, Sylvain N, Quentin J, Bjoern N, Christophe B 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 820 Google Scholar
[30]	Chen B, Yu Z S, Liu K, et al. 2019 Joule 3 177 Google Scholar
[31]	Martin A G, Stephen P B 2017 Nat. Mater. 16 23 Google Scholar
[32]	Pabitra K N, Suhas M, Henry J S, David C 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 269 Google Scholar
[33]	Yuan Y B, Xiao Z G, Yang B, Huang J S 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 6027 Google Scholar
[34]	蔡田怡, 雎胜 2018 物理学报 67 157801 Google Scholar Cai T Y, Ju S 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 157801 Google Scholar
[35]	Yang S Y, Seidel J, Byrnes S J, Shafer P, Yang C H, Rossell M D, Yu P, Chu Y H, Scott J F, Ager III J W, Martin L W, Ramesh R 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 143 Google Scholar
[36]	Guo R, You L, Lin W N, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2571 Google Scholar
[37]	Jhonata R V, Gislayne R A S, Márcio R M 2022 Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 19 1779 Google Scholar
[38]	Ma G, Jiang W, Sun W, Yan Z, Sun B, Li S, Zhang M, Wang X, Gao A, Dai J, Liu Z, Li P, Tang W 2021 Phys. Scr. 96 125823 Google Scholar
[39]	Pal S, Sarath N V, Priya K S, Murugavel P 2022 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 55 283001 Google Scholar
[40]	Seung M L, Ahra C, Yong S C 2016 RSC Adv. 6 16602 Google Scholar
[41]	Jin C, Li X W, Han W Q, et al. 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 41315 Google Scholar
[42]	Guo D, Liu H, Li P, Wu Z, Wang S, Cui C, Li C, Tang W 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 1619 Google Scholar
[43]	Xu H, Lin Y, Harumoto T, Shi J, Nan C 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 30127 Google Scholar
[44]	Lu W, Fan Z, Yang Y, Ma J, Lai J, Song X, Zhuo X, Xu Z, Liu J, Hu X, Zhuo S, Xiu F, Cheng J, Sun D 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 1623 Google Scholar
[45]	Yao Q, Liu W, Zhang R, Ma Y, Wang Y, Hu R, Mao W, Pu Y, Li X 2019 ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 7 12439 Google Scholar
[46]	Sun D, Ehrenfreund E, Vardeny Z V 2014 Chem. Commun. 50 1781 Google Scholar
[47]	Sagar R U R, Zhang X, Wang J, Xiong C 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 123708 Google Scholar
[48]	Gautam B R, Nguyen T D, Ehrenfreund E, Vardeny Z V 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 205207 Google Scholar
[49]	Wang J, Chepelianskii A, Gao F, Greenham N C 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 1191 Google Scholar
[50]	Hu B, Yan L, Shao M 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 1500 Google Scholar
[51]	Devir-Wolfman A H, Khachatryan B, Gautam B R, Tzabary L, Keren A, Tessler N, Vardeny Z V, Ehrenfreund E 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4529 Google Scholar
[52]	Muneeswaran M, Giridharan N V 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 214109 Google Scholar
[53]	Sharma G N, Dutta S, Singh S K, Chatterjee R 2016 Mater. Res. Express 3 106202 Google Scholar
[54]	Wang J J, Hu J M, Yang T N, Feng M, Zhang J X, Chen L Q, Nan C W 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 4553 Google Scholar
[55]	Wei S, Wenxuan W, Dong C, Zhenxiang C, Tingting J, Yuanxu W 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 16393 Google Scholar
[56]	Tan K H, Chen Y W, Van Nguyen C, et al. 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 1655 Google Scholar
[57]	Lu Y, Fan Z, Liang F, Yang Z, Liang Z T, Zeyu Z, Guohong M, Daniel S, Andrivo R, Le W, Lei C, Andrew M R, Junling W 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat3438 Google Scholar
[58]	翟宏如, 都有为, 韩秀峰, 刘俊明, 王克锋, 赵建华, 邓加军, 郑厚植, 邢定钰, 夏钶, 周仕明, 苏刚, 蔡建旺 2013 自旋电子学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第459, 460页 Zhai H R, Du Y Y, Han X F, Liu J M, Wang K F, Zhao J H, Deng J J, Zheng H Z, Xing D Y, Xia K, Zhou S M, Su G, Cai J W 2013 Spintronics (Beijing: Science Press) pp459, 460 (in Chinese)

施引文献

图 1 BFO薄膜在300 K温度下的(a) XRD图谱和(b)拉曼光谱

Fig. 1. The XRD pattern (a) and Raman spectrum (b) of the BFO thin film at 300 K.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 BFO薄膜在300 K温度下的(a)磁滞回线图和(b)电滞回线图

Fig. 2. The M-H hysteresis loop (a) and the P-E hysteresis loops (b) of the BFO film at 300 K.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 室温下样品J-V曲线在无磁场黑暗条件下及光照下随外磁场增强的响应情况

Fig. 3. The J-V curves of the sample at room temperature under dark conditions without magnetic field and under light with the increase of external magnetic field.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 在偏压分别为(a), (c) 0 V和(b), (d) 1 V时, 室温下样品的(a), (b)光电流随磁场变化曲线以及(c), (d) $ {D}_{{\rm{M}}{\rm{P}}{\rm{C}},{\rm{V}}} $值随磁场变化的响应曲线

Fig. 4. Change curves of photocurrent (a), (b) and $ {D}_{{\rm{M}}{\rm{P}}{\rm{C}},{\rm{V}}} $(c), (d) with the alteration of magnetic field for the sample at room temperature with the bias of (a), (c) 0 V and (b), (d) 1 V.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 (a) Fe³⁺简并轨道能量、自旋光电子与电子能带态密度示意图; (b)外磁场作用下Fe³⁺能带移动示意图

Fig. 5. (a) Schematic diagram of the Fe³⁺ degenerate orbital energy, spin photoelectron and electron band density of state; (b) schematic diagram of the Fe³⁺ band movement under the external magnetic field.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Guo R, You L, Zhou Y, Shiuh L Z, Zou X, Chen L, Ramesh R, Wang J L 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1990 Google Scholar
[2]	Wei M C, Liu M F, Yang L, Xie B, Li X, Wang X Z, Cheng X Y, Zhu Y D, Li Z J, Su Y L, Li M Y, Hu Z Q, Liu J M 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 5126 Google Scholar
[3]	Thakoor S 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 3319 Google Scholar
[4]	张亚菊, 谢忠帅, 郑海务, 袁国亮 2020 物理学报 69 127709 Google Scholar Zhang Y J, Xie Z S, Zheng H W, Yuan G L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 127709 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang J, Ma J, Yang Y B, Chen M F, Zhang J X, Ma J, Nan C W 2019 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 1 862 Google Scholar
[6]	Li J K, Ge C, Jin K J, Du J Y, Yang J T, Lu H B, Yang G Z 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 142901 Google Scholar
[7]	Wang X D, Wang P, Wang J L, Hu W D, Zhou X H, Guo N, Huang H, Sun S, Shen H, Lin T, Tang M H, Liao L, Jiang A Q, Sun J L, Meng X J, Chen X S, Lu W, Chu J H 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 6575 Google Scholar
[8]	Wang P, Wang Y, Ye L, Wu M Z, Xie R Z, Wang X D, Chen X S, Fan Z Y, Wang J L, Hu W D 2018 Small 14 e1800492 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhao Q L, He G P, Di J J, Song W L, Hou Z L, Tan P P, Wang D W, Cao M S 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 24696 Google Scholar
[10]	Sujoy K G, Jinyoung K, Minsoo P K, Sangyun N, Jeonghoon C, Jae J K, Hyunhyub K 2022 ACS Nano 16 11415 Google Scholar
[11]	Huangfu G, Xiao H, Guan L, Zhong H, Hu C, Shi Z, Guo Y 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 33950 Google Scholar
[12]	Tan Z W, Hong L Q, Fan Z, Tian J J, Zhang L Y, Jiang Y, Hou Z P, Chen D Y, Qin M H, Zeng M, Gao J W, Lu X B, Zhou G F, Gao X S, Liu J M 2019 NPG Asia Mater. 11 20 Google Scholar
[13]	Nechache R, Harnagea C, Li S, Cardenas L, Huang W, Chakrabartty J, Rosei F 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 61 Google Scholar
[14]	Grinberg I, West D V, Torres M, Gou G Y, Stein D M, Wu L Y, Chen G N, Gallo E M, Akbashev A R, Davies P K, Spanier J E, Rappe A M 2013 Nature 503 509 Google Scholar
[15]	Chakrabartty J, Harnagea C, Celikin M, Rosei F, Nechache R 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 271 Google Scholar
[16]	Liu C C, Sun H Y, Ma C, Chen Z W, Luo Z, Su T S, Yin Y W, Li X G 2020 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 41 42 Google Scholar
[17]	Liu Y, Yao Y, Dong S, Yang S, Li X 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 075113 Google Scholar
[18]	Fan Z, Yao K, Wang J 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 162903 Google Scholar
[19]	Basu S R, Martin L W, Chu Y H, Gajek M, Ramesh R, Rai R C, Xu X, Musfeldt J L 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 091905 Google Scholar
[20]	Ema K, Umeda K, Toda M, Yajima C, Arai Y, Kunugita H, Wolverson D, Davies J J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 241310 Google Scholar
[21]	Hsiao Y C, Wu T, Li M, Hu B 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 2899 Google Scholar
[22]	Pavliuk M V, Fernandes D L A, El-Zohry A M, Abdellah M, Nedelcu G, Kovalenko M V, Sa J 2016 Adv. Opt. Mater. 4 2004 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang C, Sun D, Sheng C X, Zhai Y X, Mielczarek K, Zakhidov A, Vardeny Z V 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 427 Google Scholar
[24]	Even J, Pedesseau L, Jancu J M, Katan C 2014 Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 8 31 Google Scholar
[25]	Pan R, Wang K, Li Y, Yu H, Li J, Xu L 2021 Adv. Electron. Mater. 7 2100026 Google Scholar
[26]	Andy E 2019 Nature 570 429 Google Scholar
[27]	Tomas L, Kevin A B, Rohit P, Michael D M 2018 Nat. Energy 3 828 Google Scholar
[28]	Kevin A B, Axel F P, Zhengshan J Y, Mathieu B, Rongrong C, Jonathan P M, David P M, Robert L Z H, Colin D B, Tomas L, Ian M P, Maxmillian C M, Nicholas R, Rohit P, Sarah S, Duncan H, Wen M, Farhad M, Henry J S, Tonio B, Zachary C H, Stacey F B, Michael D M 2017 Nat. Energy 2 17009 Google Scholar
[29]	Florent S, Jérémie W, Brett A K, Matthias B, Raphaël M, Bertrand P S, Loris B, Laura D, Juan J D L, Davide S, Gianluca C, Matthieu D, Mathieu B, Sylvain N, Quentin J, Bjoern N, Christophe B 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 820 Google Scholar
[30]	Chen B, Yu Z S, Liu K, et al. 2019 Joule 3 177 Google Scholar
[31]	Martin A G, Stephen P B 2017 Nat. Mater. 16 23 Google Scholar
[32]	Pabitra K N, Suhas M, Henry J S, David C 2019 Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 269 Google Scholar
[33]	Yuan Y B, Xiao Z G, Yang B, Huang J S 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 6027 Google Scholar
[34]	蔡田怡, 雎胜 2018 物理学报 67 157801 Google Scholar Cai T Y, Ju S 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 157801 Google Scholar
[35]	Yang S Y, Seidel J, Byrnes S J, Shafer P, Yang C H, Rossell M D, Yu P, Chu Y H, Scott J F, Ager III J W, Martin L W, Ramesh R 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 143 Google Scholar
[36]	Guo R, You L, Lin W N, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2571 Google Scholar
[37]	Jhonata R V, Gislayne R A S, Márcio R M 2022 Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 19 1779 Google Scholar
[38]	Ma G, Jiang W, Sun W, Yan Z, Sun B, Li S, Zhang M, Wang X, Gao A, Dai J, Liu Z, Li P, Tang W 2021 Phys. Scr. 96 125823 Google Scholar
[39]	Pal S, Sarath N V, Priya K S, Murugavel P 2022 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 55 283001 Google Scholar
[40]	Seung M L, Ahra C, Yong S C 2016 RSC Adv. 6 16602 Google Scholar
[41]	Jin C, Li X W, Han W Q, et al. 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 41315 Google Scholar
[42]	Guo D, Liu H, Li P, Wu Z, Wang S, Cui C, Li C, Tang W 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 1619 Google Scholar
[43]	Xu H, Lin Y, Harumoto T, Shi J, Nan C 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 30127 Google Scholar
[44]	Lu W, Fan Z, Yang Y, Ma J, Lai J, Song X, Zhuo X, Xu Z, Liu J, Hu X, Zhuo S, Xiu F, Cheng J, Sun D 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 1623 Google Scholar
[45]	Yao Q, Liu W, Zhang R, Ma Y, Wang Y, Hu R, Mao W, Pu Y, Li X 2019 ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 7 12439 Google Scholar
[46]	Sun D, Ehrenfreund E, Vardeny Z V 2014 Chem. Commun. 50 1781 Google Scholar
[47]	Sagar R U R, Zhang X, Wang J, Xiong C 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 123708 Google Scholar
[48]	Gautam B R, Nguyen T D, Ehrenfreund E, Vardeny Z V 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 205207 Google Scholar
[49]	Wang J, Chepelianskii A, Gao F, Greenham N C 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 1191 Google Scholar
[50]	Hu B, Yan L, Shao M 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 1500 Google Scholar
[51]	Devir-Wolfman A H, Khachatryan B, Gautam B R, Tzabary L, Keren A, Tessler N, Vardeny Z V, Ehrenfreund E 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4529 Google Scholar
[52]	Muneeswaran M, Giridharan N V 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 214109 Google Scholar
[53]	Sharma G N, Dutta S, Singh S K, Chatterjee R 2016 Mater. Res. Express 3 106202 Google Scholar
[54]	Wang J J, Hu J M, Yang T N, Feng M, Zhang J X, Chen L Q, Nan C W 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 4553 Google Scholar
[55]	Wei S, Wenxuan W, Dong C, Zhenxiang C, Tingting J, Yuanxu W 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 16393 Google Scholar
[56]	Tan K H, Chen Y W, Van Nguyen C, et al. 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 1655 Google Scholar
[57]	Lu Y, Fan Z, Liang F, Yang Z, Liang Z T, Zeyu Z, Guohong M, Daniel S, Andrivo R, Le W, Lei C, Andrew M R, Junling W 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat3438 Google Scholar
[58]	翟宏如, 都有为, 韩秀峰, 刘俊明, 王克锋, 赵建华, 邓加军, 郑厚植, 邢定钰, 夏钶, 周仕明, 苏刚, 蔡建旺 2013 自旋电子学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第459, 460页 Zhai H R, Du Y Y, Han X F, Liu J M, Wang K F, Zhao J H, Deng J J, Zheng H Z, Xing D Y, Xia K, Zhou S M, Su G, Cai J W 2013 Spintronics (Beijing: Science Press) pp459, 460 (in Chinese)

[1]	肖杨杨, 王晓方. 磁场对超热电子产生Kα辐射对比度的影响. 物理学报, 2025, 74(13): . doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20250144
[2]	赵新丽, 马国亮, 马余刚. 中高能重离子碰撞中的电磁场效应和手征反常现象. 物理学报, 2023, 72(11): 112502. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230245
[3]	刘川川, 郝飞翔, 殷月伟, 李晓光. Pt/BiFeO₃/Nb:SrTiO₃异质结的光伏效应和光调控整流特性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(12): 127301. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200280
[4]	张亚菊, 谢忠帅, 郑海务, 袁国亮. Au-BiFeO₃纳米复合薄膜的电学和光伏性能优化. 物理学报, 2020, 69(12): 127709. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200309
[5]	朱立峰, 潘文远, 谢燕, 张波萍, 尹阳, 赵高磊. 缺陷离子调控对BiFeO₃-BaTiO₃基钙钛矿材料的铁电光伏特性影响. 物理学报, 2019, 68(21): 217701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190996
[6]	蔡田怡, 雎胜. 铁电体的光伏效应. 物理学报, 2018, 67(15): 157801. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180979
[7]	杨双波. 温度与外磁场对Si均匀掺杂的GaAs量子阱电子态结构的影响. 物理学报, 2014, 63(5): 057301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.057301
[8]	唐田田, 张朝民, 张敏. 氢负离子在磁场和金属面附近电子通量分布的研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(12): 123201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.123201
[9]	张歆, 章晓中, 谭新玉, 于奕, 万蔡华. Al2O3增强的Co2-C98/Al2O3/Si异质结的光伏效应. 物理学报, 2012, 61(14): 147303. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.147303
[10]	唐田田, 王德华, 黄凯云, 王姗姗. 氢负离子在磁场和电介质表面附近光剥离的研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(6): 063202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.063202
[11]	吴利华, 章晓中, 于奕, 万蔡华, 谭新玉. a-C: Fe/AlOx/Si基异质结的光伏效应. 物理学报, 2011, 60(3): 037807. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.037807
[12]	蔡利兵, 王建国. 微波磁场和斜入射对介质表面次级电子倍增的影响. 物理学报, 2010, 59(2): 1143-1147. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1143
[13]	张雯. 磁场微重力效应的研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(4): 2405-2409. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2405
[14]	王新军, 王玲玲, 黄维清, 唐黎明, 陈克求. 磁场下含结构缺陷多组分超晶格中的局域电子态和电子输运. 物理学报, 2006, 55(7): 3649-3655. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3649
[15]	张助华, 郭万林, 郭宇锋. 轴向磁场对碳纳米管电子性质的影响. 物理学报, 2006, 55(12): 6526-6531. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6526
[16]	韩逸, 班春燕, 巴启先, 王书晗, 崔建忠. 磁场对液态铝和固态铁界面微观组织的影响. 物理学报, 2005, 54(6): 2955-2960. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2955
[17]	黄维清, 陈克求, 帅志刚, 王玲玲, 胡望宇. 磁耦合效应对半无限超晶格中表面电子态的影响. 物理学报, 2004, 53(7): 2330-2335. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.2330
[18]	陈正林, 张杰. 对超热电子诱生的磁场分布的估算. 物理学报, 2001, 50(4): 735-740. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.735
[19]	郭永, 顾秉林, 川添良幸. 磁量子结构中二维自旋电子的隧穿输运. 物理学报, 2000, 49(9): 1814-1820. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1814
[20]	陈正林, 张杰. 对超热电子诱生的磁场分布的估算. 物理学报, 2000, 49(11): 2180-2185. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2180

计量

文章访问数: 7184
PDF下载量: 155
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

铁酸铋薄膜光电流的磁场调制研究