-
The single event effect (SEE) and the total ionizing dose (TID) effect of a commercial enhancement mode gallium nitride (GaN) high electron nobility transistor (HEMT) with p-type gate structure and cascode structure are studied by using the radiation of heavy ions and 60Co gamma in this paper. The safe operating areas ofSEE, the sensitive parameters degradation of TID effect and the SEE and TID characteristics of GaN HEMT device are respectively presented. The experimental results show that the SEE and TID effect have less influence on the p-type gate GaN device. The linear energy transfer (LET) threshold of the single event Burnout effect (SEB) is higher than 37 MeV·cm2/mg and the failure threshold of TID effect is above 1M rad (Si) for p-type gate GaN device. However, the GaN HEMT device with cascode structure is much more sensitive to SEE and TID effect than p-type gate GaN device. Under heavy ions at LET of 22 MeV·cm2/mg and a cumulative dose of 200 krad (Si), the SEB phenomenon and parameters-degradation of cascode-type GaN HEMT are respectively observed. Besides, the circuit structure of the cascode-type GaN HEMT device is analyzed by using metallographic microscope imaging and focused ions beam technology. It reveals the possible reason why it is sensitive to SEB and TID for cascode-type GaN HEMT. These results show that the extra carriers caused by heavy ion radiation can tunnel the Schottky barrier formed by gate metal and AlGaN layer, leading to a large source-drain current in GaN HEMT device. Meanwhile, it is shown that the metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor in cascode circuit for TP90H180PS GaN HEMT may be the main reason why the cascode-type GaN HEMT is sensitive to TID.
-
Keywords:
- single event burnout effect /
- total dose effect /
- heavy ion /
- gallium nitride high electron mobility transistor
[1] Scheick L Z 2017 Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems Geneva, Switzerland, October 2−6, 2017 pp 1−7
[2] Bazzoli S, Girard S, Ferlet-Cavrois V, Baggio J, Paillet P, Duhamel O 2007 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems Deauville, France, September 10−14, 2007 pp1−5
[3] 郭伟玲, 陈艳芳, 李松宇, 雷亮, 柏常青 2007 发光学报 38 760
Guo W L, Chen Y F, Li S Y, Lei L, Bai C Q 2007 Chinese J. Lumin. 38 760
[4] 何亮, 刘扬 2016 电源学报 14 1
He L, Liu Y 2016 J. Power Supply 14 1
[5] Martinez M J, King M. P, Baca A G, Aller-man A A, Armstrong A A, Klein B A, Douglas E A, Kaplar R J, Swanson S E 2019 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 66 344
Google Scholar
[6] Onoda S, Hasuike A, Nabeshima Y, Sasaki H, Yajima K, Sato S I, Ohshima T 2013 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 4446
Google Scholar
[7] Mizuta E, Kuboyama S, Nakada Y, Takeyama A, Ohshima T, Iwata Y, Suzuki K 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 1956
Google Scholar
[8] 谷文萍, 张进城, 王冲, 冯倩, 马晓华, 郝跃 2009 物理学报 58 1161
Google Scholar
Gu W P, Zhang J C, Wang C, Feng Q, Ma X H, Hao Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1161
Google Scholar
[9] Xiao S, Saadat O I, Chen J, Zhang E X, Cui S, Palacios T, Fleetwood D M, Ma T P 2013 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 4074
Google Scholar
[10] 董世剑, 郭红霞, 马武英, 吕玲, 潘霄宇, 雷志锋, 岳少忠, 郝蕊静, 琚安安, 钟向丽, 欧阳晓平 2020 物理学报 69 078501
Google Scholar
Dong S J, Guo H X, Ma W Y, Lv L, Peng X Y, Lei Z F, Yue S Z, Hao R J, Ju A A, Zhong X L, Ouyang X P 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 078501
Google Scholar
[11] Jiang R, Zhang E X, Mccurdy M W, Wang P, Gong H, Yan D, Schrimpf R D, Fleetwood D M 2019 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 66 170
Google Scholar
[12] Aktas O, Kuliev A, Kumar V, Schwindt R, Toshkov S, Costescu D, Stubbins J, Adesida I 2004 Solid State Electron. 48 471
Google Scholar
[13] 张明兰, 杨瑞霞, 李卓昕, 曹兴忠, 王宝义, 王晓辉 2013 物理学报 62 117103
Google Scholar
Zhang M L, Yang R X, Li Z X, Cao X Z, Wang B Y, Wang X H 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 117103
Google Scholar
[14] Wrobel F, Touboul A D, Pouget V, Dilillo L, Boch J, Saigne F 2017 Microelectron Reliab. 76 644
[15] Rowena I B, Selvaraj S L, Egawa T 2011 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32 1534
Google Scholar
[16] Khachatrian A, Roche N J H, Buchner S P, Koehler A D, Greenlee J D, Anderson T J, Warner J H, McMorrow D 2016 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 63 1995
Google Scholar
[17] Zerarka M, Austin P, Bensoussan A, Morancho F, Durier A 2017 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64 2242
[18] Scheick L 2014 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 61 2881
Google Scholar
[19] Oldham T, Mclean F 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 483
Google Scholar
[20] Fleetwood D M 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 1465
Google Scholar
-
图 1 实验现场 (a)单粒子效应实验现场; (b)总剂量效应实验现场
Figure 1. Experiment setup: (a) SEE experiment; (b) TID experiment.
图 2 GaN器件开封装图 (a) GS0650111L; (b) TP90H180PS
Figure 2. The decapping photograph of GaN device: (a) GS0650111L; (b) TP90H180PS.
图 3 单粒子和总剂量效应实验电路原理图
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of SEE and TID test circuit.
图 4 (a) GS0650111L和TP90H180PS器件安全工作区域; (b)漏、栅端电流随时间的变化
Figure 4. (a) Safe operating area of GS0650111L and TP90H180PS; (b) the variations of drain current and gate current with time.
图 5 TP90H180PS器件发生SEB的实物图 (a) SEB敏感区域; (b) SEB区域局部示意图
Figure 5. The SEB photograph of TP90H180PS: (a) SEB sensitive areas; (b) partial enlargement of SEB sensitive areas.
图 6 器件漏极电流随辐照累积剂量及退火时间(168 h)的变化 (a)开态偏置; (b)关态偏置
Figure 6. The variations of drain current with cumulative dose and annealing time: (a) On-state bias; (b) off-state bias.
图 7 器件阈值电压随辐照累积剂量及退火时间(168 h)的变化关系 (a)开态偏置; (b)关态偏置
Figure 7. The variations of threshold voltage with cumulative dose and annealing time: (a) On-state bias; (b) off-state bias.
图 8 重离子辐照后关态模式下Cascode器件的栅漏电流随漏极电压的变化
Figure 8. The variations of gate/drain current with drain voltage for Cascode device in off-state mode after heavy ion irradiation.
图 9 (a) Cascode型GaN HEMT电路结构原理图; (b)耗尽型GaN HEMT的剖面示意图
Figure 9. (a) The circuit schematic diagram of Cascode type GaN HEMT device; (b) the cross-section diagram of the depletion type GaN HEMT.
图 10 p型栅GaN HEMT的剖面示意图
Figure 10. The cross-section diagram of the p-type gate GaN HEMT.
表 1 实验样品的参数
Table 1. Parameters of the tested sample.
型号 类型 结构 额定电
压/V导通电
阻/mΩ生产厂商 GS0650111L 增强型 p型栅 650 150 GaN Systems TP90H180PS 增强型 Cascode 900 205 Transphorm 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Scheick L Z 2017 Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems Geneva, Switzerland, October 2−6, 2017 pp 1−7
[2] Bazzoli S, Girard S, Ferlet-Cavrois V, Baggio J, Paillet P, Duhamel O 2007 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems Deauville, France, September 10−14, 2007 pp1−5
[3] 郭伟玲, 陈艳芳, 李松宇, 雷亮, 柏常青 2007 发光学报 38 760
Guo W L, Chen Y F, Li S Y, Lei L, Bai C Q 2007 Chinese J. Lumin. 38 760
[4] 何亮, 刘扬 2016 电源学报 14 1
He L, Liu Y 2016 J. Power Supply 14 1
[5] Martinez M J, King M. P, Baca A G, Aller-man A A, Armstrong A A, Klein B A, Douglas E A, Kaplar R J, Swanson S E 2019 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 66 344
Google Scholar
[6] Onoda S, Hasuike A, Nabeshima Y, Sasaki H, Yajima K, Sato S I, Ohshima T 2013 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 4446
Google Scholar
[7] Mizuta E, Kuboyama S, Nakada Y, Takeyama A, Ohshima T, Iwata Y, Suzuki K 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 1956
Google Scholar
[8] 谷文萍, 张进城, 王冲, 冯倩, 马晓华, 郝跃 2009 物理学报 58 1161
Google Scholar
Gu W P, Zhang J C, Wang C, Feng Q, Ma X H, Hao Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1161
Google Scholar
[9] Xiao S, Saadat O I, Chen J, Zhang E X, Cui S, Palacios T, Fleetwood D M, Ma T P 2013 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 4074
Google Scholar
[10] 董世剑, 郭红霞, 马武英, 吕玲, 潘霄宇, 雷志锋, 岳少忠, 郝蕊静, 琚安安, 钟向丽, 欧阳晓平 2020 物理学报 69 078501
Google Scholar
Dong S J, Guo H X, Ma W Y, Lv L, Peng X Y, Lei Z F, Yue S Z, Hao R J, Ju A A, Zhong X L, Ouyang X P 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 078501
Google Scholar
[11] Jiang R, Zhang E X, Mccurdy M W, Wang P, Gong H, Yan D, Schrimpf R D, Fleetwood D M 2019 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 66 170
Google Scholar
[12] Aktas O, Kuliev A, Kumar V, Schwindt R, Toshkov S, Costescu D, Stubbins J, Adesida I 2004 Solid State Electron. 48 471
Google Scholar
[13] 张明兰, 杨瑞霞, 李卓昕, 曹兴忠, 王宝义, 王晓辉 2013 物理学报 62 117103
Google Scholar
Zhang M L, Yang R X, Li Z X, Cao X Z, Wang B Y, Wang X H 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 117103
Google Scholar
[14] Wrobel F, Touboul A D, Pouget V, Dilillo L, Boch J, Saigne F 2017 Microelectron Reliab. 76 644
[15] Rowena I B, Selvaraj S L, Egawa T 2011 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32 1534
Google Scholar
[16] Khachatrian A, Roche N J H, Buchner S P, Koehler A D, Greenlee J D, Anderson T J, Warner J H, McMorrow D 2016 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 63 1995
Google Scholar
[17] Zerarka M, Austin P, Bensoussan A, Morancho F, Durier A 2017 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64 2242
[18] Scheick L 2014 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 61 2881
Google Scholar
[19] Oldham T, Mclean F 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 483
Google Scholar
[20] Fleetwood D M 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 1465
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7419
- PDF Downloads: 282
- Cited By: 0
