-
Perovskite/silicon heterojunction tandem solar cells have developed rapidly in recent years, and their efficiency is enhanced from 13.7% to 29.1%. As is well known, the optical loss has a great influence on the efficiency. Due to the complex fabrication process of tandem solar cells, it is important to obtain high-performance tandems through optical simulation. In this paper, optical simulation methods are mainly summarized from two aspects: commercial software and self-built model. Then, the progress of optical simulation is analyzed in terms of reflection loss and parasitic absorption. Finally, what should be paid more attention to in the optical simulation of tandem solar cells is pointed out. The efficiency limit of perovskite/silicon heterojunction tandem solar cells can reach up to 40%, but there remains much room for improvement. The research on optical simulation will lay the foundation of developing the tandem solar cells.
-
Keywords:
- perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells /
- optical simulation /
- reflection losses /
- parasitic absorption
[1] Yoshikawa K, Kawasaki H, Yoshida W, Irie T, Konishi K, Nakano K, Uto T, Adachi D, Kanematsu M, Uzu H 2017 Nat. Energy 2 17032
Google Scholar
[2] Wolf S D, Descoeudres A, Holman Z C, Ballif C 2012 Green 2 7
[3] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050
[4] Bailie C D, Mcgehee M D 2015 MRS Bull. 40 681
Google Scholar
[5] Etgar L, Gao P, Xue Z, Peng Q, Chandiran A K, Liu B, Nazeeruddin M K, Graetzel M 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 17396
Google Scholar
[6] Eperon G E, Stranks S D, Menelaou C, Johnston M B, Herz L M, Snaith H J 2014 Energy Environ. Sci. 7 982
Google Scholar
[7] Dewi H A, Wang H, Li J, Thway M, Sridharan R, Stangl R, Lin F, Aberle A G, Mathews N, Bruno A, Mhaisalkar S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 34178
Google Scholar
[8] Qiu W, Paetzold U W, Aernouts T, Debucquoy M, Gehlhaar R, Poortmans J 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 1489
Google Scholar
[9] Jackson E 1995 Transactions of the Conference on the Use of Solar Energy Tucson, October 31–November 1, 1995 5 122
[10] Werner J, Niesen B, Ballif C 2018 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 17 00731
[11] Kohnen E 2020 European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EUPVSEC) Lisbon, Portugal, Germany, September 7–11, 2020
[12] Filipic M, Loper P, Niesen B, de Wolf S, Krc J, Ballif C, Topic M 2015 Opt. Express 23 A263
Google Scholar
[13] Loper P, Niesen B, Moon S J, Martin de Nicolas S, Holovsky J, Remes Z, Ledinsky M, Haug F J, Yum J H, De Wolf S, Ballif C 2014 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 4 1545
Google Scholar
[14] Lal N N, White T P, Catchpole K R 2014 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 4 1380
Google Scholar
[15] Shockley W, Queisser H J 1961 J. Appl. Phys. 32 510
Google Scholar
[16] Brittman S, Garnett E C 2016 J. Phys. Chem. A 120 616
[17] Green M A 2015 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92 1305
[18] Hara T, Maekawa T, Minoura S, Sago Y, Niki S, Fujiwara H 2014 Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 034012
Google Scholar
[19] Nakane A, Tampo H, Tamakoshi M, Fujimoto S, Kim K M, Kim S, Shibata H, Niki S, Fujiwara H 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 61
[20] Nakane A, Fujimoto S, Fujiwara H 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 122 20
[21] Altazin S, Stepanova L, Lapagna K, Losio P, Ruhstaller B 2018 Opt. Express 26 A579
Google Scholar
[22] Chen D, Manley P, Tockhorn P, Eisenhauer D, Jäger K 2018 J. Photonics Energy 8 2
[23] Jacobs D A, Langenhorst M, Sahli F, Richards B S, Paetzold U W 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 3159
Google Scholar
[24] Askari S A, Kumar M, Das M K 2018 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 33 115003
Google Scholar
[25] Guang T Y, Pei Q G, Paul, Procel, Gianluca, Limodio, Arthur, Weeber 2018 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 186 13
[26] Park H, Lee Y J, Shin M, Lee Y J, Lee J, Park C, Yi 2018 Curr. Photovoltaics Research 4 102
[27] Borah C K, Tyagi P K, Kumar S, Patel K 2018 Comput. Mater. Sci. 151 65
Google Scholar
[28] Santbergen R, Uzu H, Yamamoto K, Zeman M 2019 IEEE J. Photovoltaics PP 1
[29] Macqueen R W, Martin L, Jens N, Mathias M, Clemens G, Sara J C, Klaus J G, Tayebjee M J Y, Schmidt T W, Bernd R 2018 Mater. Horiz. 5 1065
Google Scholar
[30] Nico T, Oliver H H, Christoph G J, Benedikt B S 2018 Opt. Express 2 6
[31] Solar Energy Systems, Johannes E, Nico T, Habtamu G https://pvlighthouse.com.au/cms/simulation-programs/optos [2020-10-23]
[32] JCMsuite, Jservice http://www.jservice.com.cn/sciencenews/jcmsuite/ [2020-10-23]
[33] Ernst M, Holst H, Winter M, Altermatt P P 2016 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 157 913
Google Scholar
[34] Bird R E, Riordan C 1986 J. Climate Appl. Meteor. 25 87
Google Scholar
[35] Mcintosh K R, Cotsell J N, Norris A W, Powell N E, Ketola B M 2010 Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Hawaii, June 20–25, 2010 p269
[36] Baker-Finch S C, Mcintosh K R 2010 Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) December 17–19, 2010 p2184
[37] Eisenlohr J, Tucher N, Hn O, Hauser H, Peters M, Kiefel P, Goldschmidt J C, BläSi B 2015 Opt. Express 23 A502
Google Scholar
[38] Tucher N, Eisenlohr J, Kiefel P, Höhn O, Bläsi B 2015 Opt. Express 23 A1720
Google Scholar
[39] Basore P A 2020 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 10 905
Google Scholar
[40] Basore P A 2018 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 9 106
[41] Simulation Software, Beat R, Daniele B http://www.fluxim.com/setfos-intro/ [2020-10-23]
[42] Simulation Software, Alex N, Marc B, Koen D, Stefaan D, Johan V http://scaps.elis.ugent.be/ [2020-10-23]
[43] Liu Y, Sun Y, Rockett A 2012 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 98 124
Google Scholar
[44] Liu Y, Sun Y, Rockett A 2012 IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Austin, USA, June 3–8, 2012 p000902
[45] Liu Y, Heinzel D, Rockett A 2011 IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Orlando, USA, February 17–19, 2011 p002753
[46] Liu Y, Heinzel D, Rockett A 2010 IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Honolulu, USA, June 20–25, 2010 p001943
[47] Qarony W, Hossain M I, Hossain M K, Uddin M J, Haque A, Saad A R, Tsang Y H 2017 Results Phys. 7 4287
Google Scholar
[48] Chen G L, Han C, Yan L L, Li Y, Zhao Y, Zhang X D 2019 J. Semicond. 40 12
[49] Gong J, Dai R, Wang Z, Zhang C, Yuan X, Zhang Z 2017 Mater. Res. Express 4 085005
Google Scholar
[50] Xu J P, Zhang R J, Zhang Y, Wang Z Y, Chen L, Huang Q H, Lu H L, Wang S Y, Zheng Y X, Chen L Y 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 3316
Google Scholar
[51] 李江, 唐敬友, 裴旺, 魏贤华, 黄峰 2015 物理学报 11 110702
Google Scholar
Li J, Tang J Y, Pei W, Wei X H, Huang F 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 11 110702
Google Scholar
[52] Prange M P, Rehr J J, Rivas G, Kas J J, Lawson, John W 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 15
[53] Minkov A D 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 22 1157
[54] Marquez E, Ramirez-Malo J, Villares P, Jimenez-Garay R, Ewen P J S, Owen A E 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 139 535
[55] Yue L, Chen H 2019 EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. 19 1474
[56] Henderson D, Jacobson S H, Johnson A W 2003 Handbook of Metaheuristics (Boston: Springer) (Vol.3) p287
[57] Li J C, Su J H 2012 Adv. Mater. Res. 462 33
Google Scholar
[58] Attia A A, El-Bana M S, Habashy D M, Fouad S S, El-Bakry M Y 2017 J. Appl. Res. Technol. 15 423
[59] Bittkau K, Kirchartz T, Rau U 2018 Opt. Express 26 181
[60] 叶帆, 顾兵, 黄晓琴 2010 光学仪器 32 90
Google Scholar
Ye F, Gu B, Huang X Q 2010 Opt. Instrum. 32 90
Google Scholar
[61] 李国龙, 钟景明, 王立惠, 李进, 何力军, 李海波, 高忙忙 2016 激光与光电子学进展 53 4
Li G L, Zhong J M, Wang L H, Li J, He L J, Li H B, Gao M M 2016 Las. Optoelect. Prog. 53 4
[62] Su W T, Li B, Liu D Q, Zhang F S 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 3343
Google Scholar
[63] 周毅 2010 硕士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院研究生院)
Zhou Y 2010 M. S. Thesis (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences) (in Chinese)
[64] 蒋和伦, 刘启能 2016 半导体光电 37 218
Jiang H L, Liu Q N 2016 Semiconductor Optoelectronics 37 218
[65] Nakanishi A, Takiguchi Y, Miyajima S 2016 Phys. Status Solidi A. ePSS 213 1997
[66] Hou Y, Aydin E, Bastiani M D, Xiao C, Isikgor H F, Xue D J 2020 Science 367 1135
Google Scholar
[67] Jošt M, Köhnen E, Morales-Vilches A B, Lipovšek B, Jäger K, Macco B, Al-Ashouri A, Krč J, Korte L, Rech B 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 3511
Google Scholar
[68] Tao H, Zhang W, Zhang C, Han L, Wang J, Tan B, Li Y, Kan C 2019 Opt. Commun. 56 112
[69] Manzoor S, Yu Z J, Ali A, Ali W, Bush K A, Palmstrom A F, Bent S F, Mcgehee M D, Holman Z C 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells S S0927024817303288
[70] Hou F H, Han C, Isabella O, Yan L L, Shi B, Chen J, An S C, Zhou Z, Huang W, Ren H Z, Zhao Y, Zhang X D 2018 Nano Energy 56 234
[71] Kohnen E, Jot M, Morales-Vilches A B, Tockhorn P, Al-Ashouri A, Macco B, Kegelmann L, Korte L, Rech B, Schlatmann R 2019 Sustainable Energy Fuels 3 1995
Google Scholar
[72] Bett A J, Winkler K M, Bivour M 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 45796
Google Scholar
[73] Jager K, Korte L, Rech B, Albrecht S 2017 Opt. Express 25 12
[74] Salman M, Jakob H, Kevin A B, Axel F P, Joe C, Zhengshan J Y, Stacey F B, Michael D M, Zachary C H 2018 Opt. Express 26 27441
[75] Santbergen R, Mishima R, Meguro T, Hino M, Uzu H, Blanker J, Yamamoto K, Zeman M 2016 Opt. Express 24 A1288
Google Scholar
[76] Mazzarella L, Werth M, Jäger K, Jošt M, Stannowski B 2018 Opt. Express 26 103
[77] Schneider B W, Lal N N, Baker-Finch S, White T P 2014 Opt. Express 22 Suppl 6 A1422
[78] Chen B, Yu Z J, Manzoor S, Manzoor S, Wang S, Weigand W, Yu Z, Yang G, Ni Z, Dai X, C.Holman Z, Huang J 2020 Joule 4 850
Google Scholar
[79] Wang D L, Cui H J, Hou G J, Zhu Z G, Yan Q B, Su G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 18922
Google Scholar
-
图 3 (a) 光学导纳法自建模型的光线分析过程[19]; CH3NH3PbI3为吸收层的太阳电池的(b)结构和(c)光学损耗分析[19]; (d) 钙钛矿/硅异质结叠层太阳电池隧穿结优化的光损耗分析[59]
Figure 3. (a) Light analysis process of optical admittance method[19]; (b) structure and (c) optical loss analysis of solar cells with CH3NH3PbI3 as absorber[19]; (d) tunnel junction optical loss analysis of perovskite / silicon tandem solar cells[59].
图 4 (a) PDMS作减反层的电池结构[69]; (b) 有、无PDMS减反层的器件EQE对比[69]; (c) LM箔作减反层的电池结构[67]; (d), (e) LM箔作减反层的优化结果[67]
Figure 4. (a) Solar cell structure using PDMS as anti-reflection coating[69]; (b) EQE comparison with and without PDMS[69]; (c) solar cell structure using LM foil as anti-reflection coating[67]; (d) (e) optimized result using LM foil as anti-reflection coating[67].
图 5 (a) 使用LiF作减反层的电池结构[71]; (b) LiF作减反层的电池优化结果[71]; (c) 使用MgF2作减反层的电池结构和优化结果[72]
Figure 5. (a) Solar cell structure with LiF as anti-reflection coating[71]; (b) optimized result with LiF as anti-reflection coating[71]; (c) solar cell structure and optimization result with MgF2 as anti-reflection coating[72].
图 6 (a) 具有平面硅底电池的叠层电池、背面制绒但正面平坦的结构以及增加了中间层的叠层电池结构、具有双面制绒的硅底电池和掩埋层的叠层电池以及增加了减反层的叠层电池、顶和底电池均是双面制绒的叠层器件[75]; (b) 平面的硅、单面制绒的硅以及双面制绒的硅作为底电池的钙钛矿/硅异质结叠层器件结构[76]; (c) 具有单面制绒、双面制绒的器件的光损耗对比图[23]
Figure 6. (a) Perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell structure with flat silicon, single-side textured silicon with/without interface layer, tandem solar cell with double-side textured silicon and burial layer, solar cell with anti-reflection layer and double-sided textured structure[75]; (b) perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell structure with flat silicon、one-side textured silicon and double-side textured silicon as bottom cell[76]; (c) comparison of optical loss of devices with one-side texture, double-side texture devices[23].
图 7 (a) 具有六角形正弦纳米结构的基底原子力显微图(AFM)[22]; (b)生长在这种基底上的钙钛矿的原子力显微图(AFM)[22]; (c)平面钙钛矿的原子力显微图(AFM)[22]; (d)未使用陷光结构的电池EQE图[22]; (e)使用陷光结构后的电池EQE图[22]; (f)和(g)蛾眼纹理钙钛矿的结构图[77]; (h)使用蛾眼纹理钙钛矿的叠层器件EQE图[77]
Figure 7. (a) Atom force microscopy (AFM) of substrate with hexagonal sinusoidal nanostructure[22]; (b) AFM image of perovskite growing on this substrate[22]; (c) AFM image of flat perovskite[22]; (d) EQE curve of solar cell without dimple structure[22]; (e) EQE curve of solar cell with dimple structure[22]; (f) and (g) structure image of perovskite with moth eye texture[77]; (h) EQE curve of device with moth eye textured perovskite[77].
图 8 (a)带有亚微米级金字塔制绒的钙钛矿/硅叠层太阳电池结构[78]; (b)叠层器件I-V测试结果[78]; (c)与其他陷光结构的对比[78]; (d)使用四种陷光结构的叠层器件的反射损耗模拟结果对比图[78]
Figure 8. (a) Structure of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with submicron pyramids textured structure[78]; (b) I-V results of devices[78]; (c) comparison with the other light trapping structures[78]; (d) comparison of reflection loss of the device using four kinds of structure[78].
图 9 (a)开槽和(b)棱镜SiO2结构减少钙钛矿太阳电池寄生吸收[79]; 叠层电池优化寄生吸收(c)前和(d)后的器件EQE对比图[73]; (e) 光学和电学综合考虑对ITO寄生吸收优化[71]; (f) 仅从光学角度优化ITO的寄生吸收[71]
Figure 9. (a) Slotted and (b) prismatic structure of SiO2 to reduce parasitic absorption of perovskite solar cells[79]; EQE comparison of tandem solar cells (c) before and (d) after optimizing for parasitic absorption[73]; (e) optimization for parasitic absorption of ITO with both optical and electrical considerations[71]; (f) optimization for parasitic absorption of ITO only considerate optical aspect[71].
表 1 商用软件模拟包及其功能
Table 1. Simulation package of commercial software and its functions.
软件名称 功能 参考文献 JCMsuite 适用于复杂纳米光学系统的仿真 [22] FDTD 使用时域有限差分算法对太阳电池模拟 [26] AFORS-HET 用于异质结构太阳电池的数值模拟软件 [27] SunCalculator 用于计算所测量的综合太阳辐照度的角度和光谱分布 [33] Solar spectrum calculator 确定入射到器件的光谱辐照度的直接分量, 散射分量和全局分量 [34] TRACEY 用于确定模块在各种入射光谱下的效率以及相关光学损耗 [35] OPAL 模拟太阳电池前表面(主要是减反层) [36] OPTOS 基于矩阵的仿真算法, 能有效地计算任何表面陷光结构的反射率和透射率 [37,38] PC3 D 用于硅太阳电池的开源三维器件模拟器 [39,40] SETFOS 计算短路电流密度(Jsc), 开路电压(Voc)和填充因子(FF), 添加光散射层以增强吸收 [21,41] SCAPS 一维太阳电池仿真, 适用于晶硅、砷化镓、非晶硅和微晶硅太阳电池 [42] WXAMPS 一维太阳电池模拟 [43—46] 
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 使用减反层减少器件反射损耗
Table 3. Using anti-reflection coating to reduce reflection loss of device.
ARC Structure Jsc /(mA·cm2) Improved Jsc/(mA·cm2) Year Ref. LiF LiF/ITO/SnO2/PCBM/perovskite/NiO/ITO/silicon 21.3 1.6 2018 [22] LiF LiF/ITO/TiO2/perovskite/spiro/p-uc-SiOx:H/defective layer/silicon 16.7 1.4 2016 [65] LM foil LM/IZO/SnO2/C60/ perovskite/PTAA/ITO/nc-SiOx:H/a-Si:H/Si/a-Si:H/ZnO:Al/Ag 19.4 2.3 2018 [67] PDMS PDMS/ITO/na-Si:H/ia-Si:H/C-Si/ia-Si:H/pa-Si:H/ITO/Ag 37.5 3.0 2017 [69] LiF LiF/IZO/SnO2/C60/perovskite /PTAA/ITO/nc-SiOx:H(n)/silicon 19.2 1.4 2019 [71] LiF LiF/ITO/SnO2/PCBM/ perovskite /NiO/ITO/silicon 19.0 1.4 2017 [73] MgF2 MgF2/ITO/SnO2/C60/ perovskite /NiO/ITO/silicon 19.8 1.0 2018 [74] MgF2 MgF2/IZO/spiro/ perovskite /TiO2/ITO/Ag 19.55 1.5 2019 [72]
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Yoshikawa K, Kawasaki H, Yoshida W, Irie T, Konishi K, Nakano K, Uto T, Adachi D, Kanematsu M, Uzu H 2017 Nat. Energy 2 17032
Google Scholar
[2] Wolf S D, Descoeudres A, Holman Z C, Ballif C 2012 Green 2 7
[3] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050
[4] Bailie C D, Mcgehee M D 2015 MRS Bull. 40 681
Google Scholar
[5] Etgar L, Gao P, Xue Z, Peng Q, Chandiran A K, Liu B, Nazeeruddin M K, Graetzel M 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 17396
Google Scholar
[6] Eperon G E, Stranks S D, Menelaou C, Johnston M B, Herz L M, Snaith H J 2014 Energy Environ. Sci. 7 982
Google Scholar
[7] Dewi H A, Wang H, Li J, Thway M, Sridharan R, Stangl R, Lin F, Aberle A G, Mathews N, Bruno A, Mhaisalkar S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 34178
Google Scholar
[8] Qiu W, Paetzold U W, Aernouts T, Debucquoy M, Gehlhaar R, Poortmans J 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 1489
Google Scholar
[9] Jackson E 1995 Transactions of the Conference on the Use of Solar Energy Tucson, October 31–November 1, 1995 5 122
[10] Werner J, Niesen B, Ballif C 2018 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 17 00731
[11] Kohnen E 2020 European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (EUPVSEC) Lisbon, Portugal, Germany, September 7–11, 2020
[12] Filipic M, Loper P, Niesen B, de Wolf S, Krc J, Ballif C, Topic M 2015 Opt. Express 23 A263
Google Scholar
[13] Loper P, Niesen B, Moon S J, Martin de Nicolas S, Holovsky J, Remes Z, Ledinsky M, Haug F J, Yum J H, De Wolf S, Ballif C 2014 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 4 1545
Google Scholar
[14] Lal N N, White T P, Catchpole K R 2014 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 4 1380
Google Scholar
[15] Shockley W, Queisser H J 1961 J. Appl. Phys. 32 510
Google Scholar
[16] Brittman S, Garnett E C 2016 J. Phys. Chem. A 120 616
[17] Green M A 2015 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92 1305
[18] Hara T, Maekawa T, Minoura S, Sago Y, Niki S, Fujiwara H 2014 Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 034012
Google Scholar
[19] Nakane A, Tampo H, Tamakoshi M, Fujimoto S, Kim K M, Kim S, Shibata H, Niki S, Fujiwara H 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 61
[20] Nakane A, Fujimoto S, Fujiwara H 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 122 20
[21] Altazin S, Stepanova L, Lapagna K, Losio P, Ruhstaller B 2018 Opt. Express 26 A579
Google Scholar
[22] Chen D, Manley P, Tockhorn P, Eisenhauer D, Jäger K 2018 J. Photonics Energy 8 2
[23] Jacobs D A, Langenhorst M, Sahli F, Richards B S, Paetzold U W 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 3159
Google Scholar
[24] Askari S A, Kumar M, Das M K 2018 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 33 115003
Google Scholar
[25] Guang T Y, Pei Q G, Paul, Procel, Gianluca, Limodio, Arthur, Weeber 2018 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 186 13
[26] Park H, Lee Y J, Shin M, Lee Y J, Lee J, Park C, Yi 2018 Curr. Photovoltaics Research 4 102
[27] Borah C K, Tyagi P K, Kumar S, Patel K 2018 Comput. Mater. Sci. 151 65
Google Scholar
[28] Santbergen R, Uzu H, Yamamoto K, Zeman M 2019 IEEE J. Photovoltaics PP 1
[29] Macqueen R W, Martin L, Jens N, Mathias M, Clemens G, Sara J C, Klaus J G, Tayebjee M J Y, Schmidt T W, Bernd R 2018 Mater. Horiz. 5 1065
Google Scholar
[30] Nico T, Oliver H H, Christoph G J, Benedikt B S 2018 Opt. Express 2 6
[31] Solar Energy Systems, Johannes E, Nico T, Habtamu G https://pvlighthouse.com.au/cms/simulation-programs/optos [2020-10-23]
[32] JCMsuite, Jservice http://www.jservice.com.cn/sciencenews/jcmsuite/ [2020-10-23]
[33] Ernst M, Holst H, Winter M, Altermatt P P 2016 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 157 913
Google Scholar
[34] Bird R E, Riordan C 1986 J. Climate Appl. Meteor. 25 87
Google Scholar
[35] Mcintosh K R, Cotsell J N, Norris A W, Powell N E, Ketola B M 2010 Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Hawaii, June 20–25, 2010 p269
[36] Baker-Finch S C, Mcintosh K R 2010 Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) December 17–19, 2010 p2184
[37] Eisenlohr J, Tucher N, Hn O, Hauser H, Peters M, Kiefel P, Goldschmidt J C, BläSi B 2015 Opt. Express 23 A502
Google Scholar
[38] Tucher N, Eisenlohr J, Kiefel P, Höhn O, Bläsi B 2015 Opt. Express 23 A1720
Google Scholar
[39] Basore P A 2020 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 10 905
Google Scholar
[40] Basore P A 2018 IEEE J. Photovoltaics 9 106
[41] Simulation Software, Beat R, Daniele B http://www.fluxim.com/setfos-intro/ [2020-10-23]
[42] Simulation Software, Alex N, Marc B, Koen D, Stefaan D, Johan V http://scaps.elis.ugent.be/ [2020-10-23]
[43] Liu Y, Sun Y, Rockett A 2012 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 98 124
Google Scholar
[44] Liu Y, Sun Y, Rockett A 2012 IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Austin, USA, June 3–8, 2012 p000902
[45] Liu Y, Heinzel D, Rockett A 2011 IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Orlando, USA, February 17–19, 2011 p002753
[46] Liu Y, Heinzel D, Rockett A 2010 IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Honolulu, USA, June 20–25, 2010 p001943
[47] Qarony W, Hossain M I, Hossain M K, Uddin M J, Haque A, Saad A R, Tsang Y H 2017 Results Phys. 7 4287
Google Scholar
[48] Chen G L, Han C, Yan L L, Li Y, Zhao Y, Zhang X D 2019 J. Semicond. 40 12
[49] Gong J, Dai R, Wang Z, Zhang C, Yuan X, Zhang Z 2017 Mater. Res. Express 4 085005
Google Scholar
[50] Xu J P, Zhang R J, Zhang Y, Wang Z Y, Chen L, Huang Q H, Lu H L, Wang S Y, Zheng Y X, Chen L Y 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 3316
Google Scholar
[51] 李江, 唐敬友, 裴旺, 魏贤华, 黄峰 2015 物理学报 11 110702
Google Scholar
Li J, Tang J Y, Pei W, Wei X H, Huang F 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 11 110702
Google Scholar
[52] Prange M P, Rehr J J, Rivas G, Kas J J, Lawson, John W 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 15
[53] Minkov A D 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 22 1157
[54] Marquez E, Ramirez-Malo J, Villares P, Jimenez-Garay R, Ewen P J S, Owen A E 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 139 535
[55] Yue L, Chen H 2019 EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. 19 1474
[56] Henderson D, Jacobson S H, Johnson A W 2003 Handbook of Metaheuristics (Boston: Springer) (Vol.3) p287
[57] Li J C, Su J H 2012 Adv. Mater. Res. 462 33
Google Scholar
[58] Attia A A, El-Bana M S, Habashy D M, Fouad S S, El-Bakry M Y 2017 J. Appl. Res. Technol. 15 423
[59] Bittkau K, Kirchartz T, Rau U 2018 Opt. Express 26 181
[60] 叶帆, 顾兵, 黄晓琴 2010 光学仪器 32 90
Google Scholar
Ye F, Gu B, Huang X Q 2010 Opt. Instrum. 32 90
Google Scholar
[61] 李国龙, 钟景明, 王立惠, 李进, 何力军, 李海波, 高忙忙 2016 激光与光电子学进展 53 4
Li G L, Zhong J M, Wang L H, Li J, He L J, Li H B, Gao M M 2016 Las. Optoelect. Prog. 53 4
[62] Su W T, Li B, Liu D Q, Zhang F S 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 3343
Google Scholar
[63] 周毅 2010 硕士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院研究生院)
Zhou Y 2010 M. S. Thesis (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences) (in Chinese)
[64] 蒋和伦, 刘启能 2016 半导体光电 37 218
Jiang H L, Liu Q N 2016 Semiconductor Optoelectronics 37 218
[65] Nakanishi A, Takiguchi Y, Miyajima S 2016 Phys. Status Solidi A. ePSS 213 1997
[66] Hou Y, Aydin E, Bastiani M D, Xiao C, Isikgor H F, Xue D J 2020 Science 367 1135
Google Scholar
[67] Jošt M, Köhnen E, Morales-Vilches A B, Lipovšek B, Jäger K, Macco B, Al-Ashouri A, Krč J, Korte L, Rech B 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 3511
Google Scholar
[68] Tao H, Zhang W, Zhang C, Han L, Wang J, Tan B, Li Y, Kan C 2019 Opt. Commun. 56 112
[69] Manzoor S, Yu Z J, Ali A, Ali W, Bush K A, Palmstrom A F, Bent S F, Mcgehee M D, Holman Z C 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells S S0927024817303288
[70] Hou F H, Han C, Isabella O, Yan L L, Shi B, Chen J, An S C, Zhou Z, Huang W, Ren H Z, Zhao Y, Zhang X D 2018 Nano Energy 56 234
[71] Kohnen E, Jot M, Morales-Vilches A B, Tockhorn P, Al-Ashouri A, Macco B, Kegelmann L, Korte L, Rech B, Schlatmann R 2019 Sustainable Energy Fuels 3 1995
Google Scholar
[72] Bett A J, Winkler K M, Bivour M 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 45796
Google Scholar
[73] Jager K, Korte L, Rech B, Albrecht S 2017 Opt. Express 25 12
[74] Salman M, Jakob H, Kevin A B, Axel F P, Joe C, Zhengshan J Y, Stacey F B, Michael D M, Zachary C H 2018 Opt. Express 26 27441
[75] Santbergen R, Mishima R, Meguro T, Hino M, Uzu H, Blanker J, Yamamoto K, Zeman M 2016 Opt. Express 24 A1288
Google Scholar
[76] Mazzarella L, Werth M, Jäger K, Jošt M, Stannowski B 2018 Opt. Express 26 103
[77] Schneider B W, Lal N N, Baker-Finch S, White T P 2014 Opt. Express 22 Suppl 6 A1422
[78] Chen B, Yu Z J, Manzoor S, Manzoor S, Wang S, Weigand W, Yu Z, Yang G, Ni Z, Dai X, C.Holman Z, Huang J 2020 Joule 4 850
Google Scholar
[79] Wang D L, Cui H J, Hou G J, Zhu Z G, Yan Q B, Su G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 18922
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 18829
- PDF Downloads: 920
- Cited By: 0
