搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

可调谐的声学型石墨烯等离激元增强纳米红外光谱

段谕 戴小康 吴晨晨 杨晓霞

引用本文:
Citation:

可调谐的声学型石墨烯等离激元增强纳米红外光谱

段谕, 戴小康, 吴晨晨, 杨晓霞

Tunable acoustic graphene plasmon enhanced nano-infrared spectroscopy

Duan Yu, Dai Xiao-Kang, Wu Chen-Chen, Yang Xiao-Xia
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 纳米红外光谱 (nano-infrared spectroscopy, nano-IR) 技术能够突破光的衍射极限, 实现约10 nm空间分辨率的红外光谱检测, 是研究纳米尺度物质化学成分和结构的重要技术手段. 然而, 由于纳米物质的尺寸与红外光的波长存在较大失配, 导致其红外吸收信号微弱. 本文理论提出了一种基于纳米腔室的声学型石墨烯等离激元 (nanocavity-acoustic graphene plasmon, n-AGP) 可调谐增强nano-IR检测平台. 该平台可实现超高光场压缩 (模式体积Vn-AGP $ \approx $10–7$ {\lambda }_{0}^{3} $, λ0 = 6.25 μm)和约50倍电场增强的n-AGP激发. 通过调控金纳米腔室结构和石墨烯费米能级, 我们实现了n-AGP的宽频段动态调控(1290—2124 cm–1). 此外, 由于n-AGP的电磁场高度局域在纳米腔室内, 具有高的探测灵敏度, 可实现单个蛋白质颗粒酰胺I带和酰胺II带振动指纹特征的探测 (灵敏度提高约9倍). 这一基于n-AGP的增强结构拓展了nano-IR技术在单分子尺度的表征能力, 可广泛应用于生物、催化等领域.
    Nano-infrared spectroscopy (nano-IR) technology can exceed the diffraction limit of light, achieving infrared spectroscopic detection with a spatial resolution of about 10 nm, which is an important technical means for studying the chemical composition and structure of molecules on a nanoscale. However, the weak infrared absorption signals of nanoscale materials pose a significant challenge due to the large mismatch between their dimensions and the wavelength of infrared light. The infrared absorption signals of molecular vibrational modes are proportional to the squares of the electromagnetic field intensities at their positions, implying that higher electromagnetic field intensity can significantly improve the sensitivity of molecular detection. Acoustic graphene plasmons (AGPs), excited by the interaction between free charges in graphene and image charges in metal, exhibit strong optical field localization and electromagnetic field enhancement. These properties make AGPs an effective platform for enhancing nano-IR detection sensitivity. However, the fabrication of graphene nanostructures often introduces numerous edge defects due to the limitations of nanofabrication techniques, significantly reducing the electromagnetic field enhancement observed in experiments. Here, we use finite element simulation to theoretically propose a tunable enhanced nano-IR detection platform based on nanocavity-acoustic graphene plasmons (n-AGPs), which utilizes a graphene/air gap/gold nanocavity structure. This platform avoids needing the nanofabrication of graphene, thereby preventing defects and contamination from being introduced in processes such as electron beam exposure and plasma etching. By plotting the dispersion of n-AGP, it is found that n-AGP has a high wavelength compression capability comparable to AGP (λ0/λAGP = 48). Additionally, due to the introduction of the gold nanocavity structure, n-AGP possess an extremely small mode volume (Vn-AGP ≈ 10–7$ {{ \lambda }}_{0}^{3} $, λ0 = 6.25 μm). By calculating the electric field intensity distribution (|Enorm|) and the normalized electric field intensity spectrum (i.e. the relationship between frequency and |Ez|/|Ez0|) of the n-AGP structure, it is evident that due to the high electron density on the gold surface, electromagnetic waves can be reflected from the boundaries of the gold nanocavity and resonantly enhanced within the nanocavity. At the resonant frequency of n-AGP (1800 cm–1), the electric field inside the cavity is enhanced by about 50 times. In contrast, at similar resonant frequencies, the electric field enhancement factor of Graphene plasmon (resonant frequency 1770 cm–1) and AGP (resonant frequency 1843 cm–1) are approximately 3 and 2 times, respectively, significantly lower than that of n-AGP. Furthermore, by placing a protein film (60 nm wide and 10 nm high) under the graphene, we calculate the spectral dip depths caused by Fano resonance between n-AGP and AGP with the vibrational modes of protein molecules, thereby validating the enhancement factors of different modes for protein vibrational mode infrared absorption. For the amide-I band of proteins, the detection sensitivity of n-AGP is about 60 times higher than that of AGP. Additionally, we find that by adjusting the structural parameters of the gold nanocavity, including cavity depth, width, and surface roughness, the response frequency band of n-AGP can be modulated (from 1290 to 2124 cm–1). Specifically, as the cavity depth increases, the electric field enhancement of n-AGP is improved, and the wavelength compression capability of n-AGP decreases, causing the resonant frequency to be blue-shifted (from 1793 to 2124 cm–1). As the cavity width increases, the resonant frequency of n-AGP is red-shifted (from 1793 to 1290 cm–1), and the effectiveness of the gold nanocavity boundary in reflecting the resonant electric field within the cavity diminishes, resulting in a decrease in the electric field enhancement factor. With the gradual increase in the roughness of the gold nanocavity bottom, the effective depth of the gold nanocavity increases, causing the n-AGP resonant frequency to be blue-shifted (from 1793 to 1861 cm–1) and the electric field enhancement factor to increase. Moreover, by adjusting the Fermi level of graphene (from 0.3 to 0.6 eV), we achieve dynamic tuning of n-AGP (from 1355 to 1973 cm–1). As the Fermi level of graphene increases, the wavelength compression capability of n-AGP decreases, resulting in a blue-shift in the resonant frequency. Finally, by optimizing the structural parameters and Fermi level of n-AGP, and placing protein particles of different sizes (20, 15, and 10 nm high, all 10 nm wide) into the graphene/gold nanocavity structure, we verify the protein detection capability of n-AGP-enhanced nano-IR. We find that n-AGP can detect the vibrational fingerprint features of the amide-I band and amide-II band. For protein films (60 nm wide and 10 nm high), the sensitivity increased by approximately 300 times, and for a single protein particle (10 nm wide and 10 nm high), the sensitivity increased by approximately 9 times. This enhanced structure based on n-AGP holds promise for providing an important detection platform for nanoscale material characterization and single-molecule detection, with broad application potential in biomedicine, materials science, and geology.
      通信作者: 吴晨晨, wucc@nanoctr.cn ; 杨晓霞, yangxx@nanoctr.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2023YFA1407003)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 52022025, 51972074)、中国科学院青年团队计划(批准号: YSBR-086)和中国科学院青年创新促进会资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wu Chen-Chen, wucc@nanoctr.cn ; Yang Xiao-Xia, yangxx@nanoctr.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFA1407003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52022025, 51972074), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (Grant No. YSBR-086), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
    [1]

    Yao Z, Xu S, Hu D, Chen X, Dai Q, Liu M 2020 Adv. Opt. Mater. 8 1901042Google Scholar

    [2]

    Chen X, Hu D, Mescall R, You G, Basov D N, Dai Q, Liu M 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1804774Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lahiri B, Holland G, Centrone A 2013 Small 9 439Google Scholar

    [4]

    Centrone A 2015 Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 8 101Google Scholar

    [5]

    Katzenmeyer A M, Holland G, Kjoller K, Centrone A 2015 Anal. Chem. 87 3154Google Scholar

    [6]

    Dazzi A, Glotin F, Carminati R 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 124519Google Scholar

    [7]

    Schwartz J J, Jakob D S, Centrone A 2022 Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 5248Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang L, Wang H, Xu X G 2022 Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 5268Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang L, Wang H, Wagner M, Yan Y, Jakob D S, Xu X G 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1700255Google Scholar

    [10]

    Wang H, Gonzalez-Fialkowski J M, Li W, Xie Q, Yu Y, Xu X G 2021 Anal. Chem. 93 3567Google Scholar

    [11]

    Davies-Jones J A, Davies P R 2022 Mater. Chem. Front. 6 1552Google Scholar

    [12]

    Rajapaksa I, Uenal K, Wickramasinghe H K 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 073121Google Scholar

    [13]

    Jahng J, Fishman D A, Park S, Nowak D B, Morrison W A, Wickramasinghe H K, Potma E O 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 2671Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xue M, Ye S, Ma X, Ye F, Wang C, Zhu L, Yang Y, Chen J 2022 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 20278Google Scholar

    [15]

    Gamage S, Howard M, Makita H, Cross B, Hastings G, Luo M, Abate Y 2018 PLoS One 13 e0199112Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kim S Y, Khanal D, Kalionis B, Chrzanowski W 2019 Nat. Protoc. 14 576Google Scholar

    [17]

    Goikoetxea M, Amenabar I, Chimenti S, Paulis M, Leiza J R, Hillenbrand R 2021 Macromolecules 54 995Google Scholar

    [18]

    Tri P N, Prud’homme R E 2018 Macromolecules 51 181Google Scholar

    [19]

    Morsch S, Liu Y, Lyon S B, Gibbon S R 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 959Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yang J, Hatcherian J, Hackley P C, Pomerantz A E 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 2179Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hassenkam T, Andersson M P, Dalby K N, Mackenzie D M A, Rosing M T 2017 Nature 548 78Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kebukawa Y, Kobayashi H, Urayama N, Baden N, Kondo M, Zolensky M E, Kobayashi K 2019 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116 753Google Scholar

    [23]

    Nishida J, Otomo A, Koitaya T, Shiotari A, Minato T, Iino R, Kumagai T 2024 Nano Lett. 24 836Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tang F, Bao P, Su Z 2016 Anal. Chem. 88 4926Google Scholar

    [25]

    Patabendigedara S, Nowak D, Nancarrow M J B, Clark S M 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92 023103Google Scholar

    [26]

    Yang X, Sun Z, Low T, Hu H, Guo X, Garcia de Abajo F J, Avouris P, Dai Q 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1704896Google Scholar

    [27]

    Hu H, Yang X, Zhai F, Hu D, Liu R, Liu K, Sun Z, Dai Q 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12334Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wu C, Guo X, Duan Y, Lü W, Hu H, Hu D, Chen K, Sun Z, Gao T, Yang X, Dai Q 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 2110525Google Scholar

    [29]

    Rodrigo D, Limaj O, Janner D, Etezadi D, García de Abajo F J, Pruneri V, Altug H 2015 Science 349 165Google Scholar

    [30]

    Hu H, Yang X, Guo X, Khaliji K, Biswas S R, García de Abajo F J, Low T, Sun Z, Dai Q 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1131Google Scholar

    [31]

    Bareza N, Jr, Gopalan K K, Alani R, Paulillo B, Pruneri V 2020 ACS Photonics 7 879Google Scholar

    [32]

    Alonso-González P, Nikitin A Y, Gao Y, Woessner A, Lundeberg M B, Principi A, Forcellini N, Yan W, Vélez S, Huber A J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Casanova F, Hueso L E, Polini M, Hone J, Koppens F H L, Hillenbrand R 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 31Google Scholar

    [33]

    Menabde S G, Lee I H, Lee S, Ha H, Heiden J T, Yoo D, Kim T T, Low T, Lee Y H, Oh S H, Jang M S 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 938Google Scholar

    [34]

    Epstein I, Alcaraz D, Huang Z, Pusapati V V, Hugonin J P, Kumar A, Deputy X M, Khodkov T, Rappoport T G, Hong J Y, Peres N M R, Kong J, Smith D R, Koppens F H L 2020 Science 368 1219Google Scholar

    [35]

    Lundeberg M B, Gao Y, Asgari R, Tan C, Van Duppen B, Autore M, Alonso-González P, Woessner A, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hillenbrand R, Hone J, Polini M, Koppens F H L 2017 Science 357 187Google Scholar

    [36]

    Alcaraz Iranzo D, Nanot S, Dias E J C, Epstein I, Peng C, Efetov D K, Lundeberg M B, Parret R, Osmond J, Hong J Y, Kong J, Englund D R, Peres N M R, Koppens F H L 2018 Science 360 291Google Scholar

    [37]

    Chen S, Autore M, Li J, Li P, Alonso-Gonzalez P, Yang Z, Martin-Moreno L, Hillenbrand R, Nikitin A Y 2017 ACS Photonics 4 3089Google Scholar

    [38]

    Olmon R L, Raschke M B 2012 Nanotechnology 23 444001Google Scholar

    [39]

    Low T, Avouris P 2014 ACS Nano 8 1086Google Scholar

    [40]

    Adato R, Altug H 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2154Google Scholar

    [41]

    Du X, Skachko I, Barker A, Andrei E Y 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 491Google Scholar

    [42]

    Rickhaus P, Maurand R, Liu M H, Weiss M, Richter K, Schönenberger C 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2342Google Scholar

    [43]

    Dorgan V E, Behnam A, Conley H J, Bolotin K I, Pop E 2013 Nano Lett. 13 4581Google Scholar

    [44]

    Hu H, Yu R, Teng H, Hu D, Chen N, Qu Y, Yang X, Chen X, McLeod A S, Alonso-González P, Guo X, Li C, Yao Z, Li Z, Chen J, Sun Z, Liu M, García de Abajo F J, Dai Q 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 1465Google Scholar

    [45]

    Lu Y H, Morales C, Zhao X, van Spronsen M A, Baskin A, Prendergast D, Yang P, Bechtel H A, Barnard E S, Ogletree D F, Altoe V, Soriano L, Schwartzberg A M, Salmeron M 2020 Nano Lett. 20 6364Google Scholar

    [46]

    Farmer D B, Rodrigo D, Low T, Avouris P 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2582Google Scholar

    [47]

    Zhuang B, Li S, Li S, Yin J 2021 Carbon 173 609Google Scholar

    [48]

    Dregely D, Neubrech F, Duan H, Vogelgesang R, Giessen H 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2237Google Scholar

    [49]

    Kawata S 2001 Near-field Optics and Surface Plasmon Polaritons (Vol. 81) (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media) p163

    [50]

    Miao X, Luk T S, Liu P Q 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 2107950Google Scholar

    [51]

    Guo Q, Li C, Deng B, Yuan S, Guinea F, Xia F 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2989Google Scholar

    [52]

    Schwaighofer A, Montemurro M, Freitag S, Kristament C, Culzoni M J, Lendl B 2018 Anal. Chem. 90 7072Google Scholar

    [53]

    Kavungal D, Magalhães P, Kumar S T, Kolla R, Lashuel H A, Altug H 2023 Sci. Adv. 9 eadg9644Google Scholar

    [54]

    López-Lorente Á I, Mizaikoff B 2016 Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 408 2875Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhang W, Chen L, Chen J, Wang L, Gui X, Ran J, Xu G, Zhao H, Zeng M, Ji J, Qian L, Zhou J, Ouyang H, Zou X 2017 Adv. Healthcare Mater. 6 1700121Google Scholar

    [56]

    Hoarau M, Badieyan S, Marsh E N G 2017 Org. Biomol. Chem. 15 9539Google Scholar

    [57]

    Talari A C S, Martinez M A G, Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, Rehman I U 2017 Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 52 456Google Scholar

    [58]

    Araki K, Yagi N, Ikemoto Y, Yagi H, Choong C J, Hayakawa H, Beck G, Sumi H, Fujimura H, Moriwaki T, Nagai Y, Goto Y, Mochizuki H 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 17625Google Scholar

    [59]

    Nabers A, Ollesch J, Schartner J, Kötting C, Genius J, Haußmann U, Klafki H, Wiltfang J, Gerwert K 2016 J. Biophotonics 9 224Google Scholar

    [60]

    Nabers A, Ollesch J, Schartner J, Kötting C, Genius J, Hafermann H, Klafki H, Gerwert K, Wiltfang J 2016 Anal. Chem. 88 2755Google Scholar

    [61]

    Lashuel H A, Overk C R, Oueslati A, Masliah E 2013 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14 38Google Scholar

    [62]

    Conway K A, Lee S J, Rochet J C, Ding T T, Williamson R E, Lansbury P T 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 571Google Scholar

    [63]

    Hardy J A, Higgins G A 1992 Science 256 184Google Scholar

    [64]

    Ballatore C, Lee V M Y, Trojanowski J Q 2007 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 663Google Scholar

  • 图 1  基于石墨烯/金纳米腔室的n-AGP (a) 石墨烯/金纳米腔室结构示意图; (b) 共振频率为1600 cm–1时, AGP沿x轴的电场强度分布图(Ex); (c) n-AGP, GP和AGP的色散关系. 白色虚线是GP的色散关系; 蓝色的点是从不同金纳腔宽度的归一化电场强度谱提取的n-AGP色散散点; 伪彩图通过提取石墨烯/10 nm空气间隙/金结构的归一化lmrp (rp为菲涅耳反射系数) 获得, 展示了AGP的色散关系; (d) n-AGP, GP和AGP与蛋白质振动模式耦合的归一化电场强度谱. AGP与蛋白质振动模式耦合的归一化电场强度谱线放大40倍. 灰色虚线代表基线. 黑色箭头代表在酰胺I带处由于法诺共振现象造成的谱线凹陷最深处. 凹陷深度分别为3 (n-AGP+蛋白质)、1.5 (GP+蛋白质)和0.05 (AGP+蛋白质). 蛋白质宽度为60 nm、高度为10 nm. 计算模型中设置空气间隙为10 nm

    Fig. 1.  n-AGP based on graphene/gold nanocavity: (a) Schematic diagram of graphene/gold nanocavity; (b) electric-field distribution of AGP at a resonance frequency of 1600 cm–1; (c) dispersion of n-AGP, GP, and AGP. The white dashed line represents the dispersion of GP; the blue dots are n-AGP dispersion scatter points extracted from normalized electric-field spectra of different nanocavity widths; the false-color background is obtained by the normalized lm rp of graphene/ 10 nm air gap/ gold structure, demonstrating the dispersion relationship of AGP (rp is the Fresnel reflection coefficient); (d) normalized electric-field spectra of n-AGP, GP and AGP coupled with proteins. The normalized electric-field spectra of AGP-protein coupling is amplified by 40 times. The gray dashed line represents the baseline. The black arrow represents the deepest spectral line depression caused by the Fano resonance phenomenon in the Amide I region. The depth of the depression is 3 (n-AGP+protein), 1.5 (GP+protein), and 0.05 (AGP+protein), respectively. The protein has a width of 60 nm and a height of 10 nm. The thickness of air gap is 10 nm in the calculation model.

    图 2  金纳米腔室的不同结构参数对n-AGP共振频率的影响 (a) 腔体深度; (b) 腔体宽度; (c) 腔体下表面粗糙度(Ra), Ra为算数平均粗糙度. 在图(a)—(c)的模拟计算中, 石墨烯费米能级被设置为0.5 eV

    Fig. 2.  Influence of different structural parameters of gold nanocavity on n-AGP resonance frequency: (a) Cavity depth; (b) width; (c) surface roughness (Ra), Ra is average roughness. In panels (a)–(c), the Fermi level of graphene is 0.5 eV.

    图 3  石墨烯费米能级对n-AGP的影响 (a) 归一化电场强度谱对石墨烯费米能级的依赖性, 模拟中设置的金纳米腔室深度为10 nm, 宽度为60 nm; (b) 不同石墨烯费米能级下计算的AGP色散关系, 空气间隙为10 nm

    Fig. 3.  Effect of graphene Fermi level on n-AGP: (a) Dependence of normalized electric-field spectra on graphene Fermi level, and the depth of the gold nanocavity is 10 nm and the width is 60 nm in the simulation; (b) dispersion relationship of AGP corresponding to different graphene Fermi levels, and the thickness of air gap is 10 nm.

    图 4  n-AGP增强nano-IR在蛋白质检测中的应用 (a) n-AGP场增强依赖频率和腔内位置变化的三维图. 白色虚线代表当x = 0 nm时, n-AGP的归一化电场强度谱. 金纳米腔室宽度为60 nm; (b) n-AGP场增强依赖频率和腔内位置变化的三维图. 蛋白质的宽度为10 nm, 高度为10 nm. 蛋白质分子的酰胺I带对应的频率为1650 cm–1, 酰胺II带对应的频率为1532 cm–1; (c) 不同尺寸蛋白质与n-AGP耦合的归一化电场强度谱. 蛋白质高度为20 nm (蓝色)、15 nm (绿色)、10 nm (红色). 蛋白质高度为10 nm时, 无增强nano-IR结构的蛋白质的归一化电场强度谱 (浅红色, 放大50倍). 蛋白质的宽度为10 nm. 灰色虚线代表基线, 黑色箭头代表由于法诺共振现象造成的谱线凹陷深度. 蛋白质高度为20, 15, 10 nm时, 谱线凹陷深度分别为1.48, 0.74, 0.06. 在模拟中, 高度为10 nm的蛋白质在酰胺I带的谐振强度为0.007

    Fig. 4.  Application of n-AGP-enhanced nano-IR in protein detection: (a) Three-dimensional diagram showing the dependency of n-AGP field enhancement on frequency and position. The white dashed line represents the normalized electric-field spectra of n-AGP extracted when x = 0 nm, and the width of the gold nanocavity is 60 nm; (b) three-dimensional diagram showing the dependency of n-AGP field enhancement on frequency and position. The width of the protein is 10 nm and the height is 10 nm; The frequency corresponding to the amide I band of protein molecules is 1650 cm–1, and the frequency corresponding to the amide II band is 1532 cm–1;(c) normalized electric-field spectra of proteins with different sizes coupled with n-AGP. Normalized electric-field spectra of proteins with height of 20 nm (blue curve), 15 nm (green curve), and 10 nm (red curve) at the center of the graphene/gold nanocavity enhanced structure. When the protein height is 10 nm, there is no enhanced nano-IR structure and the normalized electric-field spectrum (light red curve) is amplified 50 times. The width of the simulated protein is 10 nm. The gray dashed line represents the baseline, and the black arrow represents the depth of spectral line depression caused by the Fano resonance phenomenon. When the protein height is 20, 15 and 10 nm, the depth of spectral line depression is 1.48, 0.74, and 0.06, respectively. The resonance intensity of the simulated protein with a height of 10 nm at amide I band is 0.007.

  • [1]

    Yao Z, Xu S, Hu D, Chen X, Dai Q, Liu M 2020 Adv. Opt. Mater. 8 1901042Google Scholar

    [2]

    Chen X, Hu D, Mescall R, You G, Basov D N, Dai Q, Liu M 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1804774Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lahiri B, Holland G, Centrone A 2013 Small 9 439Google Scholar

    [4]

    Centrone A 2015 Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 8 101Google Scholar

    [5]

    Katzenmeyer A M, Holland G, Kjoller K, Centrone A 2015 Anal. Chem. 87 3154Google Scholar

    [6]

    Dazzi A, Glotin F, Carminati R 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 124519Google Scholar

    [7]

    Schwartz J J, Jakob D S, Centrone A 2022 Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 5248Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang L, Wang H, Xu X G 2022 Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 5268Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang L, Wang H, Wagner M, Yan Y, Jakob D S, Xu X G 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1700255Google Scholar

    [10]

    Wang H, Gonzalez-Fialkowski J M, Li W, Xie Q, Yu Y, Xu X G 2021 Anal. Chem. 93 3567Google Scholar

    [11]

    Davies-Jones J A, Davies P R 2022 Mater. Chem. Front. 6 1552Google Scholar

    [12]

    Rajapaksa I, Uenal K, Wickramasinghe H K 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 073121Google Scholar

    [13]

    Jahng J, Fishman D A, Park S, Nowak D B, Morrison W A, Wickramasinghe H K, Potma E O 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 2671Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xue M, Ye S, Ma X, Ye F, Wang C, Zhu L, Yang Y, Chen J 2022 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 20278Google Scholar

    [15]

    Gamage S, Howard M, Makita H, Cross B, Hastings G, Luo M, Abate Y 2018 PLoS One 13 e0199112Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kim S Y, Khanal D, Kalionis B, Chrzanowski W 2019 Nat. Protoc. 14 576Google Scholar

    [17]

    Goikoetxea M, Amenabar I, Chimenti S, Paulis M, Leiza J R, Hillenbrand R 2021 Macromolecules 54 995Google Scholar

    [18]

    Tri P N, Prud’homme R E 2018 Macromolecules 51 181Google Scholar

    [19]

    Morsch S, Liu Y, Lyon S B, Gibbon S R 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 959Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yang J, Hatcherian J, Hackley P C, Pomerantz A E 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 2179Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hassenkam T, Andersson M P, Dalby K N, Mackenzie D M A, Rosing M T 2017 Nature 548 78Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kebukawa Y, Kobayashi H, Urayama N, Baden N, Kondo M, Zolensky M E, Kobayashi K 2019 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116 753Google Scholar

    [23]

    Nishida J, Otomo A, Koitaya T, Shiotari A, Minato T, Iino R, Kumagai T 2024 Nano Lett. 24 836Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tang F, Bao P, Su Z 2016 Anal. Chem. 88 4926Google Scholar

    [25]

    Patabendigedara S, Nowak D, Nancarrow M J B, Clark S M 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92 023103Google Scholar

    [26]

    Yang X, Sun Z, Low T, Hu H, Guo X, Garcia de Abajo F J, Avouris P, Dai Q 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1704896Google Scholar

    [27]

    Hu H, Yang X, Zhai F, Hu D, Liu R, Liu K, Sun Z, Dai Q 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12334Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wu C, Guo X, Duan Y, Lü W, Hu H, Hu D, Chen K, Sun Z, Gao T, Yang X, Dai Q 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 2110525Google Scholar

    [29]

    Rodrigo D, Limaj O, Janner D, Etezadi D, García de Abajo F J, Pruneri V, Altug H 2015 Science 349 165Google Scholar

    [30]

    Hu H, Yang X, Guo X, Khaliji K, Biswas S R, García de Abajo F J, Low T, Sun Z, Dai Q 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1131Google Scholar

    [31]

    Bareza N, Jr, Gopalan K K, Alani R, Paulillo B, Pruneri V 2020 ACS Photonics 7 879Google Scholar

    [32]

    Alonso-González P, Nikitin A Y, Gao Y, Woessner A, Lundeberg M B, Principi A, Forcellini N, Yan W, Vélez S, Huber A J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Casanova F, Hueso L E, Polini M, Hone J, Koppens F H L, Hillenbrand R 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 31Google Scholar

    [33]

    Menabde S G, Lee I H, Lee S, Ha H, Heiden J T, Yoo D, Kim T T, Low T, Lee Y H, Oh S H, Jang M S 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 938Google Scholar

    [34]

    Epstein I, Alcaraz D, Huang Z, Pusapati V V, Hugonin J P, Kumar A, Deputy X M, Khodkov T, Rappoport T G, Hong J Y, Peres N M R, Kong J, Smith D R, Koppens F H L 2020 Science 368 1219Google Scholar

    [35]

    Lundeberg M B, Gao Y, Asgari R, Tan C, Van Duppen B, Autore M, Alonso-González P, Woessner A, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hillenbrand R, Hone J, Polini M, Koppens F H L 2017 Science 357 187Google Scholar

    [36]

    Alcaraz Iranzo D, Nanot S, Dias E J C, Epstein I, Peng C, Efetov D K, Lundeberg M B, Parret R, Osmond J, Hong J Y, Kong J, Englund D R, Peres N M R, Koppens F H L 2018 Science 360 291Google Scholar

    [37]

    Chen S, Autore M, Li J, Li P, Alonso-Gonzalez P, Yang Z, Martin-Moreno L, Hillenbrand R, Nikitin A Y 2017 ACS Photonics 4 3089Google Scholar

    [38]

    Olmon R L, Raschke M B 2012 Nanotechnology 23 444001Google Scholar

    [39]

    Low T, Avouris P 2014 ACS Nano 8 1086Google Scholar

    [40]

    Adato R, Altug H 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2154Google Scholar

    [41]

    Du X, Skachko I, Barker A, Andrei E Y 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 491Google Scholar

    [42]

    Rickhaus P, Maurand R, Liu M H, Weiss M, Richter K, Schönenberger C 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2342Google Scholar

    [43]

    Dorgan V E, Behnam A, Conley H J, Bolotin K I, Pop E 2013 Nano Lett. 13 4581Google Scholar

    [44]

    Hu H, Yu R, Teng H, Hu D, Chen N, Qu Y, Yang X, Chen X, McLeod A S, Alonso-González P, Guo X, Li C, Yao Z, Li Z, Chen J, Sun Z, Liu M, García de Abajo F J, Dai Q 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 1465Google Scholar

    [45]

    Lu Y H, Morales C, Zhao X, van Spronsen M A, Baskin A, Prendergast D, Yang P, Bechtel H A, Barnard E S, Ogletree D F, Altoe V, Soriano L, Schwartzberg A M, Salmeron M 2020 Nano Lett. 20 6364Google Scholar

    [46]

    Farmer D B, Rodrigo D, Low T, Avouris P 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2582Google Scholar

    [47]

    Zhuang B, Li S, Li S, Yin J 2021 Carbon 173 609Google Scholar

    [48]

    Dregely D, Neubrech F, Duan H, Vogelgesang R, Giessen H 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2237Google Scholar

    [49]

    Kawata S 2001 Near-field Optics and Surface Plasmon Polaritons (Vol. 81) (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media) p163

    [50]

    Miao X, Luk T S, Liu P Q 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 2107950Google Scholar

    [51]

    Guo Q, Li C, Deng B, Yuan S, Guinea F, Xia F 2017 ACS Photonics 4 2989Google Scholar

    [52]

    Schwaighofer A, Montemurro M, Freitag S, Kristament C, Culzoni M J, Lendl B 2018 Anal. Chem. 90 7072Google Scholar

    [53]

    Kavungal D, Magalhães P, Kumar S T, Kolla R, Lashuel H A, Altug H 2023 Sci. Adv. 9 eadg9644Google Scholar

    [54]

    López-Lorente Á I, Mizaikoff B 2016 Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 408 2875Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhang W, Chen L, Chen J, Wang L, Gui X, Ran J, Xu G, Zhao H, Zeng M, Ji J, Qian L, Zhou J, Ouyang H, Zou X 2017 Adv. Healthcare Mater. 6 1700121Google Scholar

    [56]

    Hoarau M, Badieyan S, Marsh E N G 2017 Org. Biomol. Chem. 15 9539Google Scholar

    [57]

    Talari A C S, Martinez M A G, Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, Rehman I U 2017 Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 52 456Google Scholar

    [58]

    Araki K, Yagi N, Ikemoto Y, Yagi H, Choong C J, Hayakawa H, Beck G, Sumi H, Fujimura H, Moriwaki T, Nagai Y, Goto Y, Mochizuki H 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 17625Google Scholar

    [59]

    Nabers A, Ollesch J, Schartner J, Kötting C, Genius J, Haußmann U, Klafki H, Wiltfang J, Gerwert K 2016 J. Biophotonics 9 224Google Scholar

    [60]

    Nabers A, Ollesch J, Schartner J, Kötting C, Genius J, Hafermann H, Klafki H, Gerwert K, Wiltfang J 2016 Anal. Chem. 88 2755Google Scholar

    [61]

    Lashuel H A, Overk C R, Oueslati A, Masliah E 2013 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14 38Google Scholar

    [62]

    Conway K A, Lee S J, Rochet J C, Ding T T, Williamson R E, Lansbury P T 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 571Google Scholar

    [63]

    Hardy J A, Higgins G A 1992 Science 256 184Google Scholar

    [64]

    Ballatore C, Lee V M Y, Trojanowski J Q 2007 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 663Google Scholar

  • [1] 侯磊, 关舒阳, 尹俊, 张语军, 肖宜明, 徐文, 丁岚. 谐振腔-单层二硫化钼系统中的高阶腔耦合等离极化激元. 物理学报, 2024, 73(22): 227102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241106
    [2] 杨肖杰, 许辉, 徐海烨, 李铭, 于鸿飞, 成昱轩, 侯海良, 陈智全. 基于石墨烯等离激元太赫兹结构的传感及慢光应用. 物理学报, 2024, 73(15): 157802. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240668
    [3] 张逸飞, 刘媛, 梅家栋, 王军转, 王肖沐, 施毅. 基于纳米金属阵列天线的石墨烯/硅近红外探测器. 物理学报, 2024, 73(6): 064202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231657
    [4] 王伟华. 二维有限元方法研究石墨烯环中磁等离激元. 物理学报, 2023, 72(8): 087301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222467
    [5] 沈艳丽, 史冰融, 吕浩, 张帅一, 王霞. 基于石墨烯的Au纳米颗粒增强染料随机激光. 物理学报, 2022, 71(3): 034206. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211613
    [6] 李泽宇, 姜去寒, 马腾洲, 袁英豪, 陈麟. 基于太赫兹石墨烯等离激元的多参数相位可调谐结构及其应用. 物理学报, 2021, 70(22): 224202. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210445
    [7] 高伟, 王博扬, 韩庆艳, 韩珊珊, 程小同, 张晨雪, 孙泽煜, 刘琳, 严学文, 王勇凯, 董军. 构建垂直金纳米棒阵列增强NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+纳米晶体的上转换发光. 物理学报, 2020, 69(18): 184213. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200575
    [8] 胡宝晶, 黄铭, 黎鹏, 杨晶晶. 基于纳米金属-石墨烯耦合的多频段等离激元诱导透明. 物理学报, 2020, 69(17): 174201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200200
    [9] 赵承祥, 郄媛, 余耀, 马荣荣, 秦俊飞, 刘彦. 等离激元增强的石墨烯光吸收. 物理学报, 2020, 69(6): 067801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191645
    [10] 陈令修, 王慧山, 姜程鑫, 陈晨, 王浩敏. 六方氮化硼表面石墨烯纳米带生长与物性研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(16): 168102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191036
    [11] 吴晨晨, 郭相东, 胡海, 杨晓霞, 戴庆. 石墨烯等离激元增强红外光谱. 物理学报, 2019, 68(14): 148103. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190903
    [12] 白清顺, 沈荣琦, 何欣, 刘顺, 张飞虎, 郭永博. 纳米微结构表面与石墨烯薄膜的界面黏附特性研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(3): 030201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172153
    [13] 陈浩, 张晓霞, 王鸿, 姬月华. 基于磁激元效应的石墨烯-金属纳米结构近红外吸收研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(11): 118101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180196
    [14] 邓红梅, 黄磊, 李静, 陆叶, 李传起. 基于石墨烯加载的不对称纳米天线对的表面等离激元单向耦合器. 物理学报, 2017, 66(14): 145201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.145201
    [15] 张超杰, 周婷, 杜鑫鹏, 王同标, 刘念华. 利用石墨烯等离激元与表面声子耦合增强量子摩擦. 物理学报, 2016, 65(23): 236801. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.236801
    [16] 盛世威, 李康, 孔繁敏, 岳庆炀, 庄华伟, 赵佳. 基于石墨烯纳米带的齿形表面等离激元滤波器的研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(10): 108402. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108402
    [17] 谢凌云, 肖文波, 黄国庆, 胡爱荣, 刘江涛. 光子晶体增强石墨烯THz吸收. 物理学报, 2014, 63(5): 057803. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.057803
    [18] 张保磊, 王家序, 肖科, 李俊阳. 石墨烯-纳米探针相互作用有限元准静态计算. 物理学报, 2014, 63(15): 154601. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.154601
    [19] 曾婷婷, 李鹏程, 周效信. 两束同色激光场和中红外场驱动氦原子在等离激元中产生的单个阿秒脉冲. 物理学报, 2014, 63(20): 203201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.203201
    [20] 尹海峰, 张红, 岳莉. C60富勒烯二聚物的等离激元激发. 物理学报, 2014, 63(12): 127303. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.127303
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1690
  • PDF下载量:  58
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-04-09
  • 修回日期:  2024-05-10
  • 上网日期:  2024-05-17
  • 刊出日期:  2024-07-05

/

返回文章
返回