Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Bound states in continuum domain of double resonant ring metal metasurfaces

Wang Yue Wang Hao-Jie Cui Zi-Jian Zhang Da-Chi

Citation:

Bound states in continuum domain of double resonant ring metal metasurfaces

Wang Yue, Wang Hao-Jie, Cui Zi-Jian, Zhang Da-Chi
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Metasurfaces have found extensive applications in microwave, terahertz, and optical range, serving different purposes such as filters, sensors, slow light devices, and nonlinear devices due to their distinctive electromagnetic response characteristics. Recent development requires metasurface devices to exhibit enhanced monochromaticity and stronger light interaction. Consequently, there is a growing interest in designing metasurfaces with high-quality factor (Q-factor) resonances, considering their crucial role in achieving sharp resonances through constructing bound states in the continuum (BIC) mode. The utilization of BIC has emerged as a prominent method of designing metasurfaces with high Q-factor resonances. Due to the fact that the changes in the structural parameters of metasurfaces can simultaneously affect the resonance of two components of q-BICs, it is difficult to achieve on-demand design of operating frequency, bandwidth, and Q-factor. In this work, we investigate a novel THz metasurfaces supporting q-BIC resonance. We optimize the geometric parameters of two split ring resonators (SRRs) to tailor the operating frequencies of intrinsic resonance, and tune the coupling between different resonance modes to form the q-BIC mode resonance. The dominant modes are demonstrated by the results of multipolar decomposition calculations of the electromagnetic field distributions and scattered power at different resonant operating frequencies. In x-polarized and y-polarized incident electromagnetic wave, the normalized coupling strength ratio between the two modes are calculated by Jaynes-Cummings model to be 0.54% (x-polarized) and 4.42% (y-polarized) respectively, which explains the law that the resonant frequency of different modes changes with the structural parameters of SRRs device. In order to analyze the refractive index sensing capabilities of our designed metasurfaces under the incident electromagnetic waves with different polarizations, we investigate the variations of the transmitted spectrum of the metasurface with refractive index of matters. The calculated results show that the sensitivity of the metasurface is 151 GHz/RIU when the incident wave is y-polarized and 108 GHz/RIU when the incident wave is x-polarized. We realize the effective control of the operating frequency, bandwidth, and Q-factor of the q-BIC mode resonance in the transmission spectrum of the metasurface, which provides a new idea for the practical designing of terahertz metasurfaces with high Q-factor.
      Corresponding author: Wang Yue, wangyue2017@xaut.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62275215), the Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities, China (Grant No. 21JP084), the Key Core Technology Research Project for Strategic Industry Chains of Xi’an Science and Technology Bureau, China (Grant No. 23LLRH0057), and the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2023GXLH-038).
    [1]

    Hsu C W, Zhen B, Stone A D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2016 Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 16048Google Scholar

    [2]

    von Neumann J, Wigner E P 1929 Physics Z 30 467

    [3]

    Kaelberer T, Fedotov V A, Papasimakis N, Tsai D P, Zheludev N I 2010 Science 330 1510Google Scholar

    [4]

    Plotnik Y, Peleg O, Dreisow F, Heinrich M, Nolte S, Szameit A, Segev M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 183901Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hsu C W, Zhen B, Lee J, Chua S L, Johnson S G, Joannopoulos J D, Soljacic M 2013 Nature 499 188Google Scholar

    [6]

    Urseel F 1997 Phys. Eng. Sci. 435 575

    [7]

    Porter R, Evans D V 2005 Wave Motion 43 29Google Scholar

    [8]

    Xiao Y X, Ma G, Zhang Z Q, Chan C T 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 166803Google Scholar

    [9]

    Retzler C H 2001 Appl. Ocean Res. 23 249Google Scholar

    [10]

    Cobelli P J, Pagneux V, Maurel A, Petitjeans P 2009 Europhys. Lett. 88 20006Google Scholar

    [11]

    Cobelli P J, Pagneux V, Maurel A, Petitjeans P 2011 J. Fluid Mech. 666 445Google Scholar

    [12]

    Fang C, Yang Q, Yuan Q, Gan X, Zhao J, Shao Y, Liu Y, Han G, Hao Y 2021 Opto-Electron. Adv. 4 200030Google Scholar

    [13]

    Friedrich H, Wintgen D 1985 Phys. Rev. A 32 3231Google Scholar

    [14]

    Feshbach H 1958 Ann. Phys. 5 357Google Scholar

    [15]

    Tittl A, Leitis A, Liu M, Yesilkoy F, Choi D Y, Neshev D N, Kivshar Y S, Altug H 2018 Science 360 1105Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jahani Y, Arvelo E R, Yesilkoy F, Koshelev K, Cianciaruso C, De Palma M, Kivshar Y, Altug H 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 3246Google Scholar

    [17]

    Chen X, Fan W 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 5876Google Scholar

    [18]

    Srivastava Y K, Ako T R, Gupta M, Bhaskaran M, Sriram S, Singh R, T 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 151105Google Scholar

    [19]

    Wang Y L, Han Z H, Du Y, Qin J Y 2021 Nanophotonics 10 1295Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yue L S, Wang Y, Cui Z J, Zhang X J, Zhu Y Q, Zhang X, Chen S G, Wang X M, Zhang K 2021 Opt. Express 29 13563Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhang Y B, Liu W W, Li Z C, Li Z, Cheng H, Chen S, Tian J G 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1842Google Scholar

    [22]

    Huo Y Y, Zhang X, Yan M, Sun K, Jiang S Z, Ning T Y, Zhao L N 2022 Opt. Express 30 19030Google Scholar

    [23]

    Foley J M, Young S M, Phillips J D 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 165111Google Scholar

    [24]

    Chen S S, Zhang W X, Yang B, Wu T, Zhang X D 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 5551Google Scholar

    [25]

    杜芊, 陈溢杭 2021 物理学报 70 154206Google Scholar

    Du Q, Chen Y H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 154206Google Scholar

    [26]

    Zhou C B, Huang L J, Jin R, Xu L, Li G H, Mohsen R, Chan X S, Lu W 2023 Laser Photonics Rev. 17 2200564Google Scholar

    [27]

    Qin H Y, Su Z P, Liu M Q, Zeng Y X, Tang M C, Li M Y, Shi Y Z, Huang W, Qiu C W, Song Q H 2023 Light Sci. Appl. 12 66Google Scholar

    [28]

    Li H J, Zhou H M, Wei G G, Xu H S, Qin M, Liu J Q, Wu F 2023 Nanoscale 15 6636Google Scholar

    [29]

    Romano S, Zito G, Torino S 2018 Photonics Res. 6 726Google Scholar

    [30]

    Zhou Y, Zheng H Y, Kravchenko I I, Valentine J 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 316Google Scholar

    [31]

    Azzam S I, Shalaev V M, Boltasseva A, Kildishev A V 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 253901Google Scholar

    [32]

    Savinov V, Fedotov V A, Zheludev N I 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 205112Google Scholar

    [33]

    Forn-Díaz P, Lamata L, Rico E, Kono J, Solano E 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 025005Google Scholar

    [34]

    Singh R, Cao W, Al-Naib I, Cong L, Withayachumnankul W, Zhang W 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 171101Google Scholar

    [35]

    Ho L, Pepper M, Taday P 2008 Nat. Photonics 2 541Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a) 金属太赫兹超表面阵列单元几何结构示意图; (b) 超表面子单元; (c) 超表面样品光学照片; (d) 超表面显微照片

    Figure 1.  (a) Geometry diagram of metal THz metasurface array cells; (b) metasurface subunits; (c) metasurface sample photographs; (d) metasurface micrographs.

    图 2  入射电磁波沿y偏振 (a) q-BIC模式谐振时的透射谱(d = 10 μm), Mode 1的电场分布(c)和表面电流分布(f); Mode 2的电场分布(d)和表面电流分布(g); (b) BIC模式谐振时的透射谱(d = 30 μm), BIC的电场分布(e)和表面电流分布(h)

    Figure 2.  y-polarized: (a) Transmission spectrum at q-BIC mode resonance (d = 10 μm), electric field distribution in Mode 1 (c) and surface current distribution (f); the electric field distribution (d) and surface current distribution (g) of Mode 2; (b) transmission spectrum at BIC mode resonance (d = 30 μm), electric field distribution (e) and surface current distribution (h) of BIC.

    图 3  入射电磁波沿x偏振 (a) q-BIC 模式谐振时的透射谱 (n=20 μm), Mode 3 处的电场分布(c)和表面电流分布(f), Mode 4处的电场分布(d)和表面电流分布(g); (b) BIC模式谐振时的透射谱(n=14.6 μm); Mode BIC处的电场分布(e)和表面电流分布(h)

    Figure 3.  x-polarized: (a) Transmission spectrum at q-BIC mode resonance (n=20 μm), electric field distribution (c) and surface current distribution (f) at Mode 3, electric field distribution (d) and surface current distribution (g) at Mode 4; (b) transmission spectrum at BIC mode resonance (n = 14.6 μm); electric field distribution (e) and surface current distribution (h) at Mode BIC.

    图 4  当入射电磁波沿y (a), x (b)偏振时的多极分解结果. MQ, EQ, TD, MD和ED分别表示磁四极子、电四极子、环偶极子、磁偶极子和电偶极子

    Figure 4.  Multipole decomposition results during irradiation of y-polarized (a) and x-polarized (b) waves: MQ, EQ, TD, MD and ED represent magnetic quadrupole, electric quadrupole, ring dipole, magnetic dipole, and electric dipole, respectively.

    图 5  y-偏振: 透射谱 (a)和q-BIC谐振透射峰的Q-因子(b)与参数d的关系; x-偏振: 透射谱(c)和q-BIC谐振透射峰的Q-因子(d)随着参数n的关系

    Figure 5.  y-polarization: Relationship of the transmission spectrum (a) and the Q-factorof the q-BIC resonant transmission peak (b) to parameter d; x-polarization: relationship of the transmission spectrum (c) and the Q-factor of and the q-BIC resonant transmission peak (d) to the parameter n.

    图 6  设待测物介电常数ε=2, 待测物厚度对超表面透射光谱的影响 (a)入射电磁波沿y方向偏振; (b)入射电磁波沿x方向偏振

    Figure 6.  The influence of the thickness of the measured object on the transmission spectrum of the metasurface with the dielectric constant of the object to be measured ε = 2: (a) The incident electromagnetic wave is polarized along the y direction; (b) the incident electromagnetic wave is polarized along the x direction.

    图 7  y-偏振 (a) q-BIC谐振透射峰与待测物介电常数ε的关系(损耗角正切tanδ = 0); (b) q-BIC谐振透射峰与待测物tanδ的关系 (介电常数ε = 1). x-偏振 (c) q-BIC谐振透射峰与待测物介电常数ε的关系(损耗角正切tanδ = 0); (d) q-BIC谐振透射峰与待测物tanδ的关系(介电常数ε = 1)

    Figure 7.  y-polarization: (a) Relationship between transmission peak of the q-BIC resonance and the dielectric constant of the subject to be measured ε (loss angle tanδ = 0); (b) relationship between q-BIC resonance transmission peak and tan δ to be measured (dielectric constant ε = 1). x-polarization: (c) Relationship between transmission peak of the q-BIC resonance and the dielectric constant of the subject to be measured ε (loss angle tanδ = 0); (d) relationship between q-BIC resonance transmission peak and tan δ to be measured (dielectric constant ε = 1).

  • [1]

    Hsu C W, Zhen B, Stone A D, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2016 Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 16048Google Scholar

    [2]

    von Neumann J, Wigner E P 1929 Physics Z 30 467

    [3]

    Kaelberer T, Fedotov V A, Papasimakis N, Tsai D P, Zheludev N I 2010 Science 330 1510Google Scholar

    [4]

    Plotnik Y, Peleg O, Dreisow F, Heinrich M, Nolte S, Szameit A, Segev M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 183901Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hsu C W, Zhen B, Lee J, Chua S L, Johnson S G, Joannopoulos J D, Soljacic M 2013 Nature 499 188Google Scholar

    [6]

    Urseel F 1997 Phys. Eng. Sci. 435 575

    [7]

    Porter R, Evans D V 2005 Wave Motion 43 29Google Scholar

    [8]

    Xiao Y X, Ma G, Zhang Z Q, Chan C T 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 166803Google Scholar

    [9]

    Retzler C H 2001 Appl. Ocean Res. 23 249Google Scholar

    [10]

    Cobelli P J, Pagneux V, Maurel A, Petitjeans P 2009 Europhys. Lett. 88 20006Google Scholar

    [11]

    Cobelli P J, Pagneux V, Maurel A, Petitjeans P 2011 J. Fluid Mech. 666 445Google Scholar

    [12]

    Fang C, Yang Q, Yuan Q, Gan X, Zhao J, Shao Y, Liu Y, Han G, Hao Y 2021 Opto-Electron. Adv. 4 200030Google Scholar

    [13]

    Friedrich H, Wintgen D 1985 Phys. Rev. A 32 3231Google Scholar

    [14]

    Feshbach H 1958 Ann. Phys. 5 357Google Scholar

    [15]

    Tittl A, Leitis A, Liu M, Yesilkoy F, Choi D Y, Neshev D N, Kivshar Y S, Altug H 2018 Science 360 1105Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jahani Y, Arvelo E R, Yesilkoy F, Koshelev K, Cianciaruso C, De Palma M, Kivshar Y, Altug H 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 3246Google Scholar

    [17]

    Chen X, Fan W 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 5876Google Scholar

    [18]

    Srivastava Y K, Ako T R, Gupta M, Bhaskaran M, Sriram S, Singh R, T 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 151105Google Scholar

    [19]

    Wang Y L, Han Z H, Du Y, Qin J Y 2021 Nanophotonics 10 1295Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yue L S, Wang Y, Cui Z J, Zhang X J, Zhu Y Q, Zhang X, Chen S G, Wang X M, Zhang K 2021 Opt. Express 29 13563Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhang Y B, Liu W W, Li Z C, Li Z, Cheng H, Chen S, Tian J G 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1842Google Scholar

    [22]

    Huo Y Y, Zhang X, Yan M, Sun K, Jiang S Z, Ning T Y, Zhao L N 2022 Opt. Express 30 19030Google Scholar

    [23]

    Foley J M, Young S M, Phillips J D 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 165111Google Scholar

    [24]

    Chen S S, Zhang W X, Yang B, Wu T, Zhang X D 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 5551Google Scholar

    [25]

    杜芊, 陈溢杭 2021 物理学报 70 154206Google Scholar

    Du Q, Chen Y H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 154206Google Scholar

    [26]

    Zhou C B, Huang L J, Jin R, Xu L, Li G H, Mohsen R, Chan X S, Lu W 2023 Laser Photonics Rev. 17 2200564Google Scholar

    [27]

    Qin H Y, Su Z P, Liu M Q, Zeng Y X, Tang M C, Li M Y, Shi Y Z, Huang W, Qiu C W, Song Q H 2023 Light Sci. Appl. 12 66Google Scholar

    [28]

    Li H J, Zhou H M, Wei G G, Xu H S, Qin M, Liu J Q, Wu F 2023 Nanoscale 15 6636Google Scholar

    [29]

    Romano S, Zito G, Torino S 2018 Photonics Res. 6 726Google Scholar

    [30]

    Zhou Y, Zheng H Y, Kravchenko I I, Valentine J 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 316Google Scholar

    [31]

    Azzam S I, Shalaev V M, Boltasseva A, Kildishev A V 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 253901Google Scholar

    [32]

    Savinov V, Fedotov V A, Zheludev N I 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 205112Google Scholar

    [33]

    Forn-Díaz P, Lamata L, Rico E, Kono J, Solano E 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 025005Google Scholar

    [34]

    Singh R, Cao W, Al-Naib I, Cong L, Withayachumnankul W, Zhang W 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 171101Google Scholar

    [35]

    Ho L, Pepper M, Taday P 2008 Nat. Photonics 2 541Google Scholar

  • [1] Ren Yang, Li Zhen-Xiong, Zhang Lei, Cui Wei, Wu Xiong-Xiong, Huo Ya-Shan, He Zhi-Hui. Tunable continuous domain bound states based on Fabry-Perot cavities and their applications. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(17): 174205. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240861
    [2] Zhang Hong-Wei, Cai Ren-Hao, Li Ji-Ning, Zhong Kai, Wang Yu-Ye, Xu De-Gang, Yao Jian-Quan. Metasurfaces based terahertz and mid- and long-wave infrared high-efficiency beam splitting devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(19): 197801. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241066
    [3] Meng Xiang-Yu, Li Tao, Yu Bin-Bin, Tai Yong-Hang. Exploring the tuning mechanism of multipolar quasi-continuous domain bound states in tetramer metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(10): 107801. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240272
    [4] Wang Dan, Li Jiu-Sheng, Guo Feng-Lei. Switchable ultra-broadband absorption and polarization conversion terahertz metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(14): 148701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240525
    [5] Zhang Xiang, Wang Yue, Zhang Wan-Ying, Zhang Xiao-Ju, Luo Fan, Song Bo-Chen, Zhang Kuang, Shi Wei. Narrow band absorption and sensing properties of the THz metasurface based on single-walled carbon nanotubes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(2): 026102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231357
    [6] Xia Zhao-Sheng, Liu Yu-Hang, Bao Zheng, Wang Li-Hua, Wu Bo, Wang Gang, Wang Hui, Ren Xin-Gang, Huang Zhi-Xiang. Strong circular dichroism chiral metasurfaces generated by quasi bound state in continuum domain. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(17): 178102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240834
    [7] Huang Ruo-Tong, Li Jiu-Sheng. Terahertz multibeam modulation reflection-coded metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(5): 054203. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221962
    [8] Yan Meng, Sun Ke, Ning Ting-Yin, Zhao Li-Na, Ren Ying-Ying, Huo Yan-Yan. Numerical study of the low- threshold nanolaser based on quasi-bound states in the continuum supported by resonant waveguide grating structures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(4): 044202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221894
    [9] Yang Dong-Ru, Cheng Yong-Zhi, Luo Hui, Chen Fu, Li Xiang-Cheng. Double-split-ring structure based ultra-broadband and ultra-thin dual-polarization terahertz metasurface with half-reflection and half-transmission. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(15): 158701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230471
    [10] Chen Wen-Bo, Chen He-Ming. Terahertz liquid crystal phase shifter based on metamaterial composite structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(17): 178701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212400
    [11] Yu Bo, Zhuang Shu-Lei, Wang Zheng-Xin, Wang Man-Shi, Guo Lan-Jun, Li Xin-Yu, Guo Wen-Rui, Su Wen-Ming, Gong Cheng, Liu Wei-Wei. Nano-printing technology based double-spiral terahertz tunable metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(11): 117801. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212408
    [12] Li Guo-Qiang, Shi Hong-Yu, Liu Kang, Li Bo-Lin, Yi Jian-Jia, Zhang An-Xue, Xu Zhuo. Multi-beam multi-mode vortex beams generation based on metasurface in terahertz band. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(18): 188701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210897
    [13] Xu Ping, Xiao Yu-Fei, Huang Hai-Xuan, Yang Tuo, Zhang Xu-Lin, Yuan Xia, Li Xiong-Chao, Wang Meng-Yu, Xu Hai-Dong. A new method of implementing simultaneous multiplexing holographic display of wavelength and polarization state with simple structure metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(8): 084201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201047
    [14] Long Jie, Li Jiu-Sheng. Terahertz phase shifter based on phase change material-metasurface composite structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(7): 074201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201495
    [15] Zhou Lu, Zhao Guo-Zhong, Li Xiao-Nan. Broadband terahertz vortex beam generation based on metasurface of double-split resonant rings. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(10): 108701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182147
    [16] Li Xiao-Nan, Zhou Lu, Zhao Guo-Zhong. Terahertz vortex beam generation based on reflective metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(23): 238101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191055
    [17] Feng Mao-Chang, Li Yong-Feng, Zhang Jie-Qiu, Wang Jia-Fu, Wang Chao, Ma Hua, Qu Shao-Bo. Research of a wide-angle backscattering enhancement metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(19): 198101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181053
    [18] Zhang Xue-Jin, Lu Yan-Qing, Chen Yan-Feng, Zhu Yong-Yuan, Zhu Shi-Ning. Terahertz surface polaritons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(14): 148705. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.148705
    [19] Zhang Yin, Feng Yi-Jun, Jiang Tian, Cao Jie, Zhao Jun-Ming, Zhu Bo. Graphene based tunable metasurface for terahertz scattering manipulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(20): 204101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.204101
    [20] Yang Lei, Fan Fei, Chen Meng, Zhang Xuan-Zhou, Chang Sheng-Jiang. Multifunctional metasurfaces for terahertz polarization controller. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(8): 080702. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.080702
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  3331
  • PDF Downloads:  219
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  24 September 2023
  • Accepted Date:  09 November 2023
  • Available Online:  08 December 2023
  • Published Online:  05 March 2024

/

返回文章
返回